tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-48912411383215684752024-02-06T21:43:53.696-08:00Marc J. Randazza - Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox EXPOSING the Dark Marc RandazzaGot a Marc Randazza Tip? ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com - Crystal L. Cox, Blogger, Enemy of Marc Randazza . Warrior of Light.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-87752835366688332052020-04-05T10:20:00.000-07:002020-04-05T10:20:03.711-07:00Alexandra Mayers on Copyright Trolls, Crissy Moran, Crystal Cox and IviewIt and Marc Randazza<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xK63wUk25jk" width="560"></iframe><br />
<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-12858588606361191322018-02-10T05:49:00.000-08:002018-02-10T05:49:09.330-08:00Zirzow and Larson Las Vegas Attorneys for Pedophile Rights Porn lawyer, White Supremacy Rights Lawyer Marc Randazza Randazza Legal Group. Marc Randazza attorney for Dennis Hof Las Vegas Virgin Auctions. <br />
<br />
Pedophile Rights Porn lawyer, White Supremacy Rights Lawyers of Randazza Legal Group. Supported by Las Vegas Attorney Matt Zirzow, Zacharia Larson and Shara Larson.<br />
<br />
Virgin auction promoter & PIMP Dennis Hof hires pedophile rights porn lawyer of Randazza Legal Group. Nevada Brothel Owner Dennis Hof.<br />
<br />
<iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mG5mTHbYsgY" width="560"></iframe><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group.</b></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">#StopHof #RandazzaLegalGroup #MattZirzow #FirstAmendment #RandazzaQuotes #ZachariaLarson</span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-11788995054282268232017-12-02T09:49:00.001-08:002017-12-02T09:49:55.516-08:00Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. " It is said that politics make strange bedfellows; so what could be stranger than Democratic State Senator Justin Jones, a Mormon with family values, and Marc Randazza, a porn attorney and a speech advocate for pedophiles whose client list includes Phillip Greaves author of "The Pedophile's Guide”"<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> SUED <a href="http://corruptlawfirms.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox</a> and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein, claiming Trademark Violations. <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc J. Randazza</a> of <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a>, and Ronald D. Green use an unconstitutional TRO to STEAL massive domain names, search engine placement and online content. Thus far the District of Nevada Judges have protected and enabled Marc Randazza's behavior, all but Judge Jennifer Dorsey. Marc Randazza uses the courts to chill speech, shut down blogs and websites that speak critical of him and gets Nevada Judges to make his targets pay Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, and Ronald D. Green legal fees for this civil and constitutional rights violation and extreme abuse of process and judicial retaliation.<br />
<br />
"Another Free Speech Win In Libel Lawsuit Disguised As A Trademark Complaint<br />
<br />
<h3 style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 5px;">
<span style="font-size: small;">from the <i>free-roaming-anti-SLAPP-law-pitches-in</i> dept<br /></span></h3>
<div class="postbody" style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Unless the Supreme Court decides to weigh in on this long-running <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140723/17064827982/doctor-criticized-his-questionable-treatment-alzheimers-patients-files-slapp-suit-to-silence-critic.shtml" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">SLAPP lawsuit</a> (highly unlikely -- and unlikely to be appealed to that level), it looks like it's finally the end of the line for Dr. Edward Tobinick and his quest to silence a critic of his questionable medical practices.<br /></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Quick recap: Dr. Tobinick claimed he could treat Alzheimer's, strokes, and other neurological maladies by repurposing an immunosuppressant drug. Dr. Steven Novella disagreed with Tobinick's unsubstantiated claims and wrote a few blog posts <a href="http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/enbrel-for-stroke-and-alzheimers/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">detailing his problems with Tobinick's treatments</a>."</div>
</div>
<br />
Click Below for Source, Full <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> Article and Lot's More<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=marc+randazza" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=marc+randazza</a><br />
<br />
"Roca Labs Exec Claims Marc Randazza Bribed Nevada Politician To Get Anti-SLAPP Law Passed<br />
<br />
"...It is said that politics make strange bedfellows; so what could be stranger than Democratic State Senator Justin Jones, a Mormon with family values, and Marc Randazza, a porn attorney and a speech advocate for pedophiles whose client list includes Phillip Greaves author of "The Pedophile's Guide”, Kink.com, Bang Bus and Milf Hunter. So what brings these two opposite personalities together: money and politics."<br />
<br />
Source, Full <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> Article and Lot's More<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=marc+randazza" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=marc+randazza</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">ALSO CHECK OUT my Blog about the </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">Unconstitutional Hypocritical Actions </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">of my Former Attorney <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc John Randazza</a>; </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;">http://UnethicalScumAttorney.blogspot.com/</span></a></b></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnL77xLqXpkWvK4d4jlW1bUcUuaHvDntX2o7Un3ZBA5A_KSE1I6rmw9j1V7dG-9VyTTLJ-fQC2oQAxMwDK6Zh9CeKMEA1wTWhrMK2NGbWzZ87JP2hGrYyxf_Z0n6k2lbJr_XdxPJeM18A/s1600/538275_477778408902904_1087044609_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="450" data-original-width="600" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnL77xLqXpkWvK4d4jlW1bUcUuaHvDntX2o7Un3ZBA5A_KSE1I6rmw9j1V7dG-9VyTTLJ-fQC2oQAxMwDK6Zh9CeKMEA1wTWhrMK2NGbWzZ87JP2hGrYyxf_Z0n6k2lbJr_XdxPJeM18A/s320/538275_477778408902904_1087044609_n.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
#RandazzaQuotes, #MarcRandazza #JenniferRandazza #RandazzaLegalGroup<br />
<a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a>, <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group/las-vegas-nevada-89135/marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group-marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group-marc-randazza-1112488" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a>, <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group/las-vegas-nevada-89135/marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group-marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group-marc-randazza-1112488" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a>, <a href="http://ronaldgreenjr.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ronald Green</a>,<br />
<br />
by <a href="http://investigativebloggercrystalcox.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-70768839235252118762017-11-09T14:34:00.001-08:002017-11-09T14:34:28.353-08:00The tactics of the Gang Stalking attorneys who work with Marc Randazza and I allege some judges in the past are just as evil as what we are hearing about Harvey Weinstein and worse. Many of these targeted whistleblowers are harassed and shamed into suicide. Marc Randazza is NOT above the law nor is ANY attorney, Godaddy insider, Google insider, Court Clerk, or ANYONE else who helped Randazza to silence Victims.<b>Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and their conspirators are CONSTANTLY active in suppressing Journalism. They use their power and position as officers of the court to intimidate, threaten, bully, and shut down those who expose the Porn Industry secrets, expose human trafficking, EXPOSE predators, and EXPOSE the attorneys who protect them. </b><br />
<br />
Marc Randazza, Ron Green and Randazza Legal Group sidesteps the First Amendment and use any intimidation tactic available. Your hearing now of how Harvey Weinstein got a gang of investigators, lawyers, spies and more to silence and intimidate women. Randazza and his co-conspirators, I allege, do the same tactics to SILENCE journalists which is what investigative bloggers are. The BIG difference is they are OFFICERS OF THE COURT.<br />
<br />
Randazza succeeds in removing mass content, getting huge judgments, getting bank records and phone records, alienating people by threatening to sue anyone who is connected to them or works with them and drives them into financial ruin, constant never ending fear and stress, and after years of that Randazza Legal Group WILL file in a court of law<b><span style="color: blue;"> to make their VICTIM, their TARGET pay for their legal fees for attacking, harassing, tormenting, suing, defaming and ruining the Targets life. </span></b><br />
<br />
Just as the Weinstein case, we see large amounts of victims come out and tell the courts what officers of the court Randazza Legal Group and ALL connected attorneys are doing. And the courts have thus far protected these guys.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-w3Y1LHDMHCAgUW5Pw_7rbNQFKG4cP1zNRgfuzapRwGfMMaotXqQ299hXVZrmpQOTJDI-5S51c7aY9HNKsvnypNfpBAdaWltjbgvb4_1K7NLyO_VhSJip6PM-RGcOePpPBJ-5C2X_QUo/s1600/images+%25281%2529.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="190" data-original-width="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-w3Y1LHDMHCAgUW5Pw_7rbNQFKG4cP1zNRgfuzapRwGfMMaotXqQ299hXVZrmpQOTJDI-5S51c7aY9HNKsvnypNfpBAdaWltjbgvb4_1K7NLyO_VhSJip6PM-RGcOePpPBJ-5C2X_QUo/s1600/images+%25281%2529.png" /></a><br />
They actual file lawsuits against each others targets, they blog the conspired narrative in mass among many "credible" officers of the court aKa attorneys. These malicious "opinions" on blogs by officers of the court are not only deemed credible and true but they are used as actual EXHIBITS in a Court of Law as Unadjudicated yet VERY EFFECTIVE evidence against their target.<br />
<br />
<b>These Gang stalking Attorneys are believed over and over as their target is NOT believed, ruled against and their life is ruined. </b><br />
<br />
Check Out <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> and Marc Randazza suing me, Crystal Cox to shut down massive online content, steal domain names and redirect them to their commercial site, bully me, harass and threaten me. Read it all and learn how these attorneys do this.<br />
<br />
Also research J. Devoy cases and cases that involve Judge Navarro and many unconstitutional TRO's. There are many cases out there where these guys sue a target, get the precedence they want, shut down content (Chill Speech) and get a Judgment in their favor to pay them HUGE legal fees for their fraud on the court, torturous interference, bullying, lying, threatening, <b>HORRIFIC RETALITION</b>.<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b><b><span style="color: blue;">Randazza v. Cox Docket</span></b><br />
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
THESE GANG STALKING ATTORNEYS threaten, sue, bully, intimidate, stalk, blog hate in mass, drive by victims homes, publish victims home address, and have a constant campaign to keep them quiet WHATEVER IT TAKES.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers was sued by Jennifer Randazza, the wife of First Amendment PORN attorney Marc Randazza. Jennifer Randazza claimed Alexandra Mayers Defamed her "per se" and painted her in False Light. This is SERIOUSLY Laughable, a Parody, a Joke. Oh wait its a REALLY BIG DEAL. As this EVIL woman, Jennifer Randazza seems to have convinced a seemingly rogue and corrupt court to actual rule in her favor. I wonder that that cost??? "per se"<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQD9JxO2rdl6wbJ3QZxdkk8Ws0njw1_sMLf_IIe0upVUhxUQtHBhzqaEgYpDfYy_PEiAPYo4wPDdiOBxgmJlwkxmDp9s5GR6jEuxYTZrHtVH6HDLRJaofSFAiaIHg58x7Atcyp7AhC6qQ/s1600/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbcAAAAJGJiZTExMDg5LTQwNWItNGY1Zi04MmQ2LTk5ZGY1MzVkZWRlYQ.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="200" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQD9JxO2rdl6wbJ3QZxdkk8Ws0njw1_sMLf_IIe0upVUhxUQtHBhzqaEgYpDfYy_PEiAPYo4wPDdiOBxgmJlwkxmDp9s5GR6jEuxYTZrHtVH6HDLRJaofSFAiaIHg58x7Atcyp7AhC6qQ/s200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbcAAAAJGJiZTExMDg5LTQwNWItNGY1Zi04MmQ2LTk5ZGY1MzVkZWRlYQ.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group represented Jennifer Randazza in this malicious UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Unlawful Lawsuit to silence and intimidate a journalist.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers / Monica Foster <span style="color: blue;"><b>NEVER had an "unhealthy obsession" with Jennifer Randazza.</b></span> Instead Alexandra Mayers dedicated her life to doing the right thing and reporting on the REAL "bad guys" such as Jennifer Randazza's husband and the thugs at his law firm Randazza Legal Group who were causing real harm to people.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers was reporting on them, exposing them and making fun of them as his her First Amendment Protected right. Jennifer Randazza is the one who had the<b> VERY "unhealthy" obsession with Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers</b> . Why not ignore the name calling? I allege that Jennifer Randazza sued Alexandra Mayers as a PROXY for her husband and his gang stalking co-conspirators to suppress Alexandra Mayers speech, steal blogs and other intellectual property, and to intimidate and bully Alexandra Mayers .<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza has a SERIOUS "unhealthy obsession" </span></b>with any woman who DARES to make fun of him, <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">call his wife a slut</a>, expose his illegal behavior, report on porn industry criminal allegations and unethical behavior and most of all WOMEN WHO DARE TO STAND UP TO HIM.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrxJYlWDsQA-LM5nZTfSIteuuXoWDN5EVqLX_UM2x4yS7OuSs8YZTfrJD7BtqlDAOk-6NIG8iHsBQS4lAelogj3brw4dBofL4CT6p6c_Pb-Jz3vojZadmVnr8_FZfp2bJgA32aGL-Zs24/s1600/Butthurt-When-popular-culture-and-political-correctness-are-synonymous.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="933" data-original-width="1400" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrxJYlWDsQA-LM5nZTfSIteuuXoWDN5EVqLX_UM2x4yS7OuSs8YZTfrJD7BtqlDAOk-6NIG8iHsBQS4lAelogj3brw4dBofL4CT6p6c_Pb-Jz3vojZadmVnr8_FZfp2bJgA32aGL-Zs24/s640/Butthurt-When-popular-culture-and-political-correctness-are-synonymous.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 12.8px;">When Jennifer Randazza Gets BUTTHURT she sues the Women who Stood up to her THUG of a Hubby</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Check Out <b><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers</a></b>, Defendant AND see how to SHUT down the TRUTH and use the Judicial Process for REVENGE against someone who called you a slut and made "parody" of your high profile life that has NO RIGHT to Privacy as suggested in their legal cases as a matter of law. See the link below for Federal Judge SHUT down of these allegations.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><b>Yet somehow the Nevada State court went along with Jennifer Randazza???</b></span></div>
<br />
Was <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> connected to Organized Crime or Pornography? Ummm geee Duh, all you have to do is look at Marc Randazza's blogs, or pool parties with predators they took their kids to as seen in<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"> this Arbitration</a>.<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTVh9ev2emNxoeErUMdNd31PjbSFJ8A2nfBLuJ_PuJn3tSTONz9zpiGxiRIz1Mbv0wGEvhOJiqZHXa3JpHvXkB50XvGXB4tfqWftucn-cwaXDh_alz2llZvi0EAL8GI6jGYNqaSaeceJI/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="188" data-original-width="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTVh9ev2emNxoeErUMdNd31PjbSFJ8A2nfBLuJ_PuJn3tSTONz9zpiGxiRIz1Mbv0wGEvhOJiqZHXa3JpHvXkB50XvGXB4tfqWftucn-cwaXDh_alz2llZvi0EAL8GI6jGYNqaSaeceJI/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Jennifer Randazza and Marc Randazza I ALLEGE have Committed <b>SERIOUS "INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT"</b> in Mass and have used the power of our legal system to do it.<br />
<br />
<b><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers</a></b>, Clark County Nevada Rob Bare, Bonnie Bulla Case Docket Linked Below<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
How in the World did Clark County Courts let Jennifer Randazza get away with these knowingly false pleadings and I allege perjury? Well who knows? I do know the TRUTH has a tendency to comet out. SO one day that too will surface from <b>the "False Light" to the "True Light"</b>.<br />
<br />
We all thought that Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and set up a meeting to discuss trying to get away from Marc Randazza. I FULLY believed that to be true, so did other followers of Monica's blogs. As someone claiming to be Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, that really happened.<br />
<br />
Monica posted on her blog about the meeting, and yeah to Divorce Marc Randazza would be to leave #organisedcrime and #prostitution as that is the industry he works in as the RECORD everywhere CLEARLY shows. So to sue Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers<br />
<br />
Jennifer Randazza made false and SERIOUSLY HARMFUL statements about me Crystal Cox and did see in sworn to be true court filings. Flat out LIES, Defamation and False Light to a Federal Court about me, yet that's ok? Why? Because it is my life SHE ruined in suing me?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUenCLBzwbh0DU3eMx58VlOxB6BDLMO64GM2BR4H6FmgDesSKAtxkQtj5NYM7fhyphenhyphenC3hyphenhyphenoNVBDp0iRdbRJ-Wnw4Hy73Vu0arVPi2ypAzqrHvQ48HZzDpHKy4UKgXrr54x-iNHZE38j56kE/s1600/e4e751b9d492d0bbaaa8b81b0790a23b.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="407" data-original-width="564" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUenCLBzwbh0DU3eMx58VlOxB6BDLMO64GM2BR4H6FmgDesSKAtxkQtj5NYM7fhyphenhyphenC3hyphenhyphenoNVBDp0iRdbRJ-Wnw4Hy73Vu0arVPi2ypAzqrHvQ48HZzDpHKy4UKgXrr54x-iNHZE38j56kE/s1600/e4e751b9d492d0bbaaa8b81b0790a23b.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
None of Jennifer Randazza's allegations are <a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">"highly offensible"</a> to the "reasonable person" and even if poor baby <a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> was offended SO WHAT. The Randazza's are the Face out there on the TV and in other mass media fighting for the right to OFFEND People.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b>Jennifer Randazza YOU DO NOT GET THE LUXURY OF BEING "OFFENDED" </b></span><br />
<br />
Again See The Court Order Below. Jennifer Randazza does not get to claim this shit, as a matter of LAW. Summary Judgement DENIAL in Randazza c. Cox. Jennifer Randazza is NOT above the Law.<br />
<a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
I allege that Jennifer Randazza perjured herself in this case and I hope to soon file criminal charges myself as Jennifer Randazza is a very dangerous woman, using the power of our judicial system and her officer of the court husband to SHUT DOWN women who call her out, tell the truth about her and her husband and make fun of Jennifer Randazza.<br />
<br />
Jennifer Randazza had such an Unhealthy Obsession with me, Crystal Cox, that she sued me for around 30 million and her husband and his law firm took my intellectual property in MASS to shut down my Speech about the RANDAZZAS.<br />
<br />
These Free Speech hating Jackasses simply removed my blogs about princess Jennifer Randazza. So we may never get to the bottom of this Slut thing or allegations of how Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza really met? Got a Tip? ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXVfG5fOECUDLGBDnddf4LlKoCrTTdU6Ksu2uTxNymS3GShCx8CVzQawvq14zyRHm8ezkjcgbdNEL3bKFKFVQtgzEpdKQ6nHDlgm5zpQReJOYMec6uCnI5gzKY0CZMyd-iR4QGMmWU9oU/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXVfG5fOECUDLGBDnddf4LlKoCrTTdU6Ksu2uTxNymS3GShCx8CVzQawvq14zyRHm8ezkjcgbdNEL3bKFKFVQtgzEpdKQ6nHDlgm5zpQReJOYMec6uCnI5gzKY0CZMyd-iR4QGMmWU9oU/s400/images+%25281%2529.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
We shall examine the Whole Is or Was <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> a Slut thing<br />
<br />
Well Marc Randazza sure does describe what I allege is a SLUT, check it out<br />
"we had a particularly spirited drunken tryst that day. Yep, some great scuba diving, some great mojitos with some of my best friends, a little whisper of “lets go take a nap,” in my ear, and a new life begins."<br />
Source and Full Drunken Tryst<br />
<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3S0adzHRefYfHQZF9ZugPYIjVFxuLyD-SBaEgPRjDPmmhOjtTXKQzQHchocjYPkn7peKP3LaAXnepNJ0GvnCCov3pQmn0vSrmMDwfbRFYxavIGTrHBKnpHstIjHx0FdGbh6k00WvTwjM/s1600/Limbaugh+Slut+Cartoon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="262" data-original-width="500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3S0adzHRefYfHQZF9ZugPYIjVFxuLyD-SBaEgPRjDPmmhOjtTXKQzQHchocjYPkn7peKP3LaAXnepNJ0GvnCCov3pQmn0vSrmMDwfbRFYxavIGTrHBKnpHstIjHx0FdGbh6k00WvTwjM/s1600/Limbaugh+Slut+Cartoon.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Oh and Check out Marc Randazza Defending Rush Limbaugh to call Sandra Fluke a SLUT, but We Dare not call Drunken Tryst get knocked up by a Porn Attorney clearly using no protection J<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">ennifer Brochey Randazza</a> a SLUT, how dare we<br />
<br />
Check this out<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-j-randazza-says-ms-mayers-got-sued.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-j-randazza-says-ms-mayers-got-sued.html</a><br />
<br />
Oh and this one, at 1;15 into it is a discussion where going after another guys wife is a First Amendment RIGHT but not for Crystal Cox or Alexandra Mayers, NOPE Sue Them.<br />
<br />
<b>Check it out</b><br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/J8_jVPjRtA0" width="560"></iframe><br />
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="color: blue;">And don't forget Joseph Rakofsky</span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://josephrakofsky.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Joseph Rakofsky</a> explained in great detail what these guys were doing and that was years ago. Still our Courts let this behavior continued. I mean who is going to disbelieve a bunch of attorneys saying the same thing and even bloggging flat out lies about people that is then used by the other attorneys in court cases as UNADJUDICATED yet effective Evidence against their target.<br />
<br />
Joseph Rakofsky AGAIN told the courts exactly what these attorneys were doing and the Courts simply ignored the victims and chose the bad guy attorneys. Meanwhile the litigant/victim is discredited in mass by their gang of attorneys, forensic accountants, journalists and judges.<br />
<br />
Open Letter I wrote to Joseph Rakofsky<br />
<a href="http://proofofcorruption.blogspot.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html">http://proofofcorruption.blogspot.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html</a><br />
<br />
JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, and RAKOFSKY LAW FIRM, P.C.,<br />
INDE)( NO.: 105573/11<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against<br />
<br />
THE WASHINGTON POST, et aI.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROTECTING THEM.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<b><span style="color: blue;">THESE GUYS REALLY DID GANG UP ON THIS GUY TO PROTECT THE LIES AND BAD, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF ONE OF THEIR OWN.</span></b><br />
<br />
A Few Research Links on Rakofsky v. the Internet.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/17292223040/judge-not-impressed-rakofsky-v-internet-dismisses-defamation-claims.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/17292223040/judge-not-impressed-rakofsky-v-internet-dismisses-defamation-claims.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110524/23465814426/recent-law-school-grad-gets-berated-judge-then-sues-nearly-everyone-who-discussed-case.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110524/23465814426/recent-law-school-grad-gets-berated-judge-then-sues-nearly-everyone-who-discussed-case.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>Joseph Rakofsky reported the Truth and experienced Judicial Retaliation in mass.</b><br />
<br />
And there are many More. The Courts know and thus far have let these guys continue to use this same tactic in State and Federal Courts. I Allege over and over that all Marc Randazza, Ronald Green, J. Devoy and ALL the attorneys named in the cases above really are and have done this stuff and the courts NEED to stop letting them get away with it.<br />
<br />
Some more Drunken Tryst Research<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=tryst" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=tryst</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-59564875703047967512017-11-02T15:28:00.001-07:002017-11-02T15:28:43.937-07:00Embattled copyright lawyer uses DMCA to remove article about himself. Marc Randazza has Abused our Justice System OVER and OVER to remove online content that did not "flatter him", exposed him or flat out criticized him.<b><span style="font-size: large;">"Marc Randazza tells Wordpress that the unflattering story "is not fair use.</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Well-known copyright lawyer Marc Randazza used the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to delete an online article about a dispute between his former employer and himself.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Click Below to Read the FULL document, So many Lies. Marc Randazza is the world's most hypocritical lawyer and violates First Amendment Rights in mass. </b></span><br />
<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/embattled-copyright-lawyer-uses-dmca-to-remove-article-about-himself/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/embattled-copyright-lawyer-uses-dmca-to-remove-article-about-himself/</span></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-72657673608648385472017-11-02T13:23:00.001-07:002017-11-02T13:23:27.862-07:00When I First Spoke to Marc Randazza he said that the Big Media had a Monopoly on Free Speech and there was Not Much I Could Do about it. Guess I Proved First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza VERY Wrong. <br />
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox was the FIRST to gain Equal Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers to that of Institutional Press Journalists.<br />
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">It was ruled for the first time that a blogger is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist.
</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /><span style="color: #222222;">On 2014, blogger Crystal Cox accused Obsidian and Kevin D. Padrick of corrupt and fraudulent conduct. Although the court dismissed most of Cox's blog posts as opinion, it found one post to be more factual in its assertions (and, therefore, defamatory).</span></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 6pt; margin-top: 6pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">It was ruled for the first time,</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-FAC20140124-17" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[17]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-CNS201401171-18" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[18]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> by the </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">,</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Arthur_L._Alarc.C3.B3n.2C_Milan_D._Smith.2C_Jr..2C_and_Andrew_D._Hurwitz-19" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[19]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> that a </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">blogger</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist and cannot be liable for defamation unless the blogger acted negligently.</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Reuters_20140117-20" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[20]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> In the decision, journalists and bloggers are equally protected under the First Amendment</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-FAC20140124-17" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[17]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> because the "protections of the First Amendment do not turn on whether the defendant was a trained journalist, formally affiliated with traditional news entities, engaged in conflict-of-interest disclosure, went beyond just assembling others' writings, or tried to get both sides of a story."</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Arthur_L._Alarc.C3.B3n.2C_Milan_D._Smith.2C_Jr..2C_and_Andrew_D._Hurwitz-19" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[19]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">:11–12</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-CNS201401172-21" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[21]</span></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span id="docs-internal-guid-0c0a1cd0-7e0a-b5dd-a462-f8233aff7a3c"></span></span><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #1155cc;">
</span><b>Source and more</b><span style="color: #1155cc;">
</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States" style="color: #1155cc; text-decoration-line: none;">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States</a></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I, Crystal Cox was the FIRST, because I refused Settlements over and over. I wanted a precedent to FREE all Citizen Journalists, Investigative Bloggers and Whistleblowers</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;">#DefamationCase #FreeSpeech #ConstitutionalLaw #CrystalCoxCase #Whistleblower #InvestigativeBlogger #Ant-Slapp #CitizenJournalist #FirstAmendment #Defamation #DefamationLawsuit </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-6255651789248999152017-11-01T18:41:00.000-07:002017-11-01T18:41:54.734-07:00Hypocritcal Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seems to be a but Slippery Under Oath or perhaps has even purjured himself yet again. Marc Randazza Bankruptcy filing as he relentless attacks blogger Crystal Cox, sure seems to be perjury to me.<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</a></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In Marc Randazza’s Recent Filing,</span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Motion for Default</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, Case 16-01111-abl </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Doc 26 Entered 10/20/17</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, he claims that ONLY upon Volokh being interested in teaming up with him was he then </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“willing to accept the case</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">”. Meaning the Crystal Cox Ninth Circuit Appeal. Yet Crystal Cox claims Randazza represented her before this and told others he was her attorney. Randazza states in earlies sworn documents a different version of his story, let’s take a look.</span></div>
<span id="docs-internal-guid-7ecfb42c-7a28-1e36-3442-6597867870ab"><br /></span>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) Says</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Only</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> upon Mr. Volokh expressing an interest in teaming up on the case with him did Mr. Randazza decide that he was willing to accept the case. (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26).”</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In this sworn statement (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) Randazza claims he was</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b> only interested</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> in representing me, Crystal Cox, with Volokh and only offered to represent me after this conversation. Even though,</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b> the only reason Volokh was talking to Randazza about me, Crystal Cox was Randazza told Volokh he represented Crystal Cox</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. And that he was brokering a deal with the Opposition in the Obsidian case, David Aman. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">The statement is false, and</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> it is making a false declaration to a Federal Court while knowing full well it is False</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> as Randazza swore to different facts in Case 2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL</span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Document 252 Filed 04/06/15, Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Marc Randazza’s sworn interrogatory answers</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. </span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">So in </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, </span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">we see RANDAZZA swearing that he </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">ONLY</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> agreed to Represent Cox after Volokh expressed interest to team up with him. We see below in a previous Sworn statement of Randazza that he was involved in representation BEFORE speaking with Volokh, talking strategy with Volokh, and only spoke with Volokh after he had already </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">put in time and material into representation</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. </span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicjBMV2pRSW16Q28/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Click Here for Exhibit clearly showing Volokh working with Randazza. Why would Volokh do that if Randazza did not flat out tell Volokh that he, Marc Randazza represented Cox</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">.</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibl9KRndUTHVFNEU/edit" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Click the Exhibit below for eMail from Volokh to Cox whereby Volokh says Marc told him that he was representing me, Crystal Cox. Randazza Continues to state that he was not my attorney nor acting as my attorney when the evidence paints a very different truth. </span></a></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Interrogatory 21 Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“Did you have phone conversations with Eugene Volokh and state that you represented Cox and discuss with him your strategy, or a deal you were trying to make with the opposition, Plaintiff’s attorney David Aman?”</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Randazza’s Sworn RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">"... Counterdefendant responds as follows:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant spoke with Eugene Volokh in December 2011. </span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant informed Volokh that if he was going to represent Cox, that Randazza would gladly bow out, and defer to Volokh to handle the case.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Volokh, however, said that he would prefer that Randazza co-counsel the case with him due to Volokh’s stated lack of litigation experience. Counterdefendant and Volokh discussed possible strategies that he and Volokh thought might be good ideas during that call.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant and Volokh both discussed the fact that Cox’s interests would be better served through settlement."</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">What gave Marc Randazza a legal right to negotiate who gets to be my attorney with him, if he was not indeed my attorney, or acting as if he was my attorney?</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Randazza and Volokh discussed strategy? About Me? They discussed that a settlement was in my, Crystal Cox’s, best interest?</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">A couple of guys deciding what was in my best interest and Randazza proceeding with steps to negotiate what was in my best interest when Randazza clearly and plainly knew that I want to appeal. I did NOT want to settle nor did I want some aggressive, asshole man to decide it would be better if I settled and push me to do what I did want to do, negotiate behind my back, and trick and deceive me by letting the deadline run out while he held himself out as my attorney so no one else would represent me, thereby blocking me from appealing. He did not know I had talked to Volokh when he tried to pull off this malicious scheme. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgN8ieTyU1jsc_rdTym4wJRHPNfW3UsTPwki8DzZUXuO5IYv3VQqGhri22XANSb5_pAGhmEZmdSMPx3PLAkwSlE4zPldwxlMOuedebbEH-75Jlg7FUtXmTDYzU1iB2daC6CpdEMB5B4e5s/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgN8ieTyU1jsc_rdTym4wJRHPNfW3UsTPwki8DzZUXuO5IYv3VQqGhri22XANSb5_pAGhmEZmdSMPx3PLAkwSlE4zPldwxlMOuedebbEH-75Jlg7FUtXmTDYzU1iB2daC6CpdEMB5B4e5s/s400/images+%25281%2529.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b>In Conclusion, </b></span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Page 38, Number 1-13 of </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Interrogatory 21 Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, Case 2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL Document 252 Filed 04/06/15 is Marc J. Randazza’s SWORN statement that the Interrogatory Answers are true to the best of his knowledge, yet we see on Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) that <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> swears to the a VERY different Answer.</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" target="_blank">See Case 16-01111-abl Doc 28 Entered 10/20/17, DECLARATION OF MARC J. RANDAZZA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT ENTERED BY THE COURT Page 16, Line 23-25 says</a>:</span></div>
<b><span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;"><b><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Dated: October 20, 2017.</span></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">/s/ Marc J. Randazza</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">MARC J. RANDAZZA</a>, ESQ.”</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">So How Can Both be True under penalty of perjury?</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#MarcRandazzaBankruptcy</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#MarcRandazza</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#RandazzaQuotes</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#RandazzaLegalGroup</a> <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</a></span></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-16649832517158585442017-10-29T15:51:00.001-07:002017-10-29T15:51:26.458-07:00In Randazza v. Cox, Nevada Judge Gloria Navarro issued an unconstitutional TRO against Blogger Crystal Cox and Gave Marc Randazza massive online content and intellectual property. Thereby shutting down Cox's speech and flat out stealing blogs, online content and redirecting MY WORK and PROPERTY to Randazza's Legal Blog SLAMMING me and Promoting him and his law firm. In that Case it was OK and seemingly Lawful for a Federal Judge to go ahead and take my Constitutional Rights. Check Out this case below where WORLDS Most Hypocritical Lawyer Marc Randazza Makes the OPPOSITE CASE AGAIN. <span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-large;">"In the </span><span style="color: blue; font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">motion to dissolve the order</a></span><span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-large;">, attorney Marc Randazza points out that fashioning a libel lawsuit as a tortious interference lawsuit doesn't change the ultimate goal of the litigation: to silence criticism."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
"<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">Judge Decides Free Speech Is Still A Right; </span></b><br />Dumps Prior Restraint Order Against Mattress Review Site<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
A couple of weeks ago, a federal judge in Utah <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170304/17525336840/utah-judge-wont-let-constitution-get-way-little-prior-restraint.shtml" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">decided prior restraint</a> was the best way to handle a recently-filed defamation suit against Honest Mattress Reviews by Purple Innovations, makers of the Purple Mattress.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Purple's lengthy filing contained numerous allegations of harm caused by Honest Mattress Reviews' extended commentary on the white plastic powder covering every mattress Purple ships. It also alleged HMR was just a front for site owner Ryan Monahan's brand management work with Purple's competitor, Ghostbed. Rather than give HMR a chance to respond, the judge decided the review site could publish nothing further about Purple or the lawsuit. It wasn't even allowed to refer to its previous rating of Purple's mattress.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Honest Mattress Review didn't care much for this decision -- one it had been given no chance to contest. <a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-review/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">It immediately posted an article</a> about the case and offered to comply with the letter of the order, but perhaps not its spirit.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>This temporary order commands that we take down all reviews, and even cease rating this company with a rating of “Poor.” Yes, indeed, we are no longer even permitted to rate this company as Poor. I guess we will change its rating to “💩.”</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>[...]</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Do you trust a company that, rather than compete in the marketplace, decides that it will just try and sue negative reviews out of existence?</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Purple Innovations immediately returned to court, demanding it find HMR in contempt of its order, in particular pointing to the poo emoji and HMR's claims about the unconstitutionality of the order and Purple's alleged disingenuousness in filing the libel suit.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-review/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">That review has since been reinstated</a> and given this header image.</span></div>
<div class="centered" style="background-color: white; display: table; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<img alt="" src="https://i.imgur.com/x8bzC2n.jpg" style="height: 225px; margin: 10px 0px; width: 500px;" /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
And HMR has published <a href="https://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-vs-honest-reviews/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">a long list of court documents</a> it has filed in this case. This includes a motion to dissolve the restraining order and a preliminary examination of the powdery substance Purple claims is harmless and that HMR claims could be hazardous to purchasers' health.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">In the <b>motion</b> [PDF] to dissolve the order, attorney Marc Randazza points out that fashioning a libel lawsuit as a tortious interference lawsuit doesn't change the ultimate goal of the litigation: to silence criticism.</a></span></div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>The action is a quintessential SLAPP suit designed to suppress negative consumer journalism. Plaintiffs have cleverly attempted to disguise this defamation claim as a Lanham Act claim – presumably to ensure the availability of Federal Court jurisdiction and to try to side-step the clear case law that cuts against them in defamation actions. But, no matter how eloquently someone may call a “dog” a “chicken,” it will never lay eggs. And styling a specious defamation claim as a Lanham Act claim does not remove the underlying speech from the protections afforded by the First Amendment.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
He also points out that Purple's claims that the plastic packing dust is harmless haven't been supported by anything Purple's willing to let customers and competitors view. Instead, it's only made vague assertions about its safety. And those statements are ultimately meaningless when examined closely.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Plaintiff sells mattresses that are made of a rubber honeycomb, which they then dust with a powder that they claim is made of plastic and has been shown to be polyethylene microspheres. In other words, someone who sleeps on these mattresses would be expected to inhale these microspheres. The Plaintiff claims that it is “non toxic” and “food grade” plastic – but this does not assuage the concerns. After all, a plastic fork is “food grade” and “non toxic” but you most certainly would not want to actually eat it. The same goes for what a person wants to put in their lungs. It was reasonable to be concerned about this “plastic powder” since (a) if the particles that make up this plastic “powder” are of a certain size, they will pass through the alveoli into the bloodstream; or (b) if they are a bit larger, they will simply lodge themselves inside the lungs.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
To support its claims, HMR put a Harvard Professor of Pathology to work. Dr. John Godleski's <a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520096/028-1-Exhibit-1-Godleski-Report.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">report</a>[PDF] is far from complete at this point, but what's contained in his preliminary examination of the powder doesn't appear to agree with Purple's assertions of harmlessness.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>By Fourier Transformed Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), the white powder particles were shown to be polyethylene, and the purple frame was found to be polyethylene-polypropylene copolymer. The foam portion of the mattress is still understudy, but has characteristics of butadiene, and may be a form of butadiene polymer.</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Polyethylene is a common plastic formed into many structures. As inhalable microspheres, these have the potential to cause respiratory irritation especially when inhaled in large numbers as shown in my laboratory (1- 4). In addition, polyethylene has been associated with allergy in the form of either asthma or contact dermatitis in sensitized individuals (5-7). Based on this assessment, it is important for consumers to be aware of the composition of this fine particulate matter in the mattress which may be released into the air and has the potential for the development of respiratory or dermal hypersensitivity in some individuals.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Also included in the filed documents is <a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/031-Werner-Declaration.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">an affidavit</a> that undercuts Purple's claims about HMR's site owner being a competitor's "brand manager." This is central to Purple's Lanham Act claims -- the claims it's using to sidestep anti-SLAPP motions. The affidavit from the competitor (Ghostbed) notes HMR's site owner has never been directly employed by Ghostbed and that Ghostbed told him to stop referring to himself as its "brand manager" after noticing that statement on his Twitter profile.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
The judge presiding over the case appears to have been overwhelmed by the pile of documents landing on his desk. A short <a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">order</a> [PDF] issued on the 15th shows what can happen when a normally adversarial process is allowed to be, you know, <em>adversarial</em>.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>For the reasons set forth in the parties’ briefing and at oral argument, the court finds a lack of “clear and unequivocal” support for a right to relief that is necessary for the entry of the “extraordinary remedy” of a preliminary injunction. Greater Yellowstone Coal v. Flowers, 321 F.3d 1250, 1256 (10th Cir. 2003). As such, the court hereby grants Defendants’ motions to dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 36), and denies Plaintiff’s oral Motion to convert the Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction. The court similarly denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery (Dkt. No. 39) and Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should not be Held in Contempt (Dkt. No. 17). The court further denies Defendants’ request for sanctions, finding that such sanctions are not warranted here.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
The restraining order is lifted and HMR's turd-laced post isn't in danger of being found contemptuous. The lawsuit should continue in a more constitutional fashion from this point forward.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Source</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170318/11382836946/judge-decides-free-speech-is-still-right-dumps-prior-restraint-order-against-mattress-review-site.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170318/11382836946/judge-decides-free-speech-is-still-right-dumps-prior-restraint-order-against-mattress-review-site.shtml</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">"<b>Conclusion and Relief Sought</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;">Because</span><b> Defendants are likely to succeed on a motion to vacate the TRO, before this Court </b></span><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">or on appeal, a stay of the TRO is warranted. Defendants’ fundamental First Amendment rights </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">must not be stymied by the speculations of a Plaintiff who wishes to shut down discussion rather </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">than answer legitimate questions, no matter how hyperbolically raised. Plaintiff has <span style="color: blue;">no likelihood </span></b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">of success on its underlying claims and was not entitled to the TRO.</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Case 2:17-cv-00138-DB Document 28 Filed 03/09/17 Page 23 of 25</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">- 24 -</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">The exigency and urgency of dissolving this temporary restraining order can not be</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">overstated. Even a temporary suppression of First Amendment rights is itself irreparable harm.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">However, given that this is information consumers need to make an informed decision about the </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">health risks inherent in use of the Purple Mattress, even a temporary suppression of this </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">information could be the proximate cause of actual illness or injury."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">" Plaintiff is clearly aggressively intent on suppressing this </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">information. At this point, the reporting has been shored up by the expert report of Dr. Godleski. </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">The Purple Mattress, as currently manufactured, appears to be a public health hazard. This Court </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">should abide no further censorship. "</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /><b>Source of Above and Full Hypocritical Filing</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>Judge Grants Randazza's Order. To bad I did not have this judge when Randazza got a TRO against me in Randazza v. Cox</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"><br />"Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">not be Held in Contempt (Dkt. No. 17),</span><b><span style="color: blue;"> Defendants Ryan Monahan and Honest Reviews, LLC’s</span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><b>Emergency Motion to Stay and Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order (Amended) (Dkt. No. </b></span><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">28), Defendant Ghostbed Inc.’s Motion to Dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. </b><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">36),</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">"For the reasons set forth in the parties’ briefing and at oral argument,</span><b><span style="color: blue;"> the court finds a</span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><b>lack of “clear and unequivocal” support for a right to relief that is necessary for the entry of the </b></span><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">“extraordinary remedy” of a preliminary injunction.</span></b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"> Greater Yellowstone Coal v. Flowers, 321 </span><span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">F.3d 1250, 1256 (10th Cir. 2003). As such, </span><b><span style="color: blue;">the court hereby grants Defendants’ motions to </span></b></span><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 36), and denies Plaintiff’s oral Motion to </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">convert the Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction.</span></b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"> "</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"><br />"For the foregoing reasons, and for those expressed in the parties’ briefing and oral</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">arguments, Docket Numbers 17 and 39, as well as Plaintiff’s oral Motion to convert the</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction, are hereby DENIED. Docket</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Number 28 and the portion of Docket Number 36 requesting dissolution of the Temporary</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Restraining Order are GRANTED. Defendants’ request for sanctions is DENIED."</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Source of Above and Full Judicial Order</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<b>Check out Randazza v. Cox Docket and See how to REALLY use prior restraint to suppress speech and flat out steal online content AND top search engine placement. </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><b>Lot's More Coming SOON on how to us a TRO effectively to Steal Content, Steal Search Engine Placement, Steal Intellectual Property and More. As inspired by Randazza Legal Group, Marc Randazza, J. DeVoy and Ronald Green. </b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">
<br /></div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Questions or Tips??? eMail me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">#MarcRandazza #RandazzaQuotes #RandazzaLegalGroup #FreeSpeech </span></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-56083201636938761592017-10-26T12:21:00.000-07:002017-10-26T12:21:08.799-07:00Marc J. Randazza, Randazza Legal Group Tactics Used by Attorneys to Bully and Harass Litigants by Blogger Crystal Cox#MarcRandazza #RandazzaLegalGroup #JudicialRetaliation #GangStalkingAttorneys<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X4V3x97VELo" width="560"></iframe><br />
<br />
<b>Have a Marc Randazza Tip? eMail me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com </b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-37481483211281153762017-10-25T19:04:00.001-07:002017-10-25T19:04:58.507-07:00Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Challenges by Liberty Media<b>Marc Randazza Bankruptcy and Liberty Media</b><br />
<br />
"In the meantime, Randazza's old employer, <b><span style="color: blue;">Liberty Media, is challenging his Nevada court filing seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.</span></b> In that filing, Randazza claimed assets of up to $10 million, and liabilities of up to $50 million. Randazza included in his liabilities <b><span style="color: #cc0000;">a potential $10 million judgement against him in a lawsuit with a blogger, Crystal Cox of Washington;</span></b> $1 million to Liberty; as well as another $1 million judgement against him in a lawsuit he's embroiled in with Roca Labs of Largo, Florida."<br />
<br />
Source and More<br />
<a href="http://1701news.com/node/1183/so-who-klingon-lawyer-marc-randazza.html" target="_blank">http://1701news.com/node/1183/so-who-klingon-lawyer-marc-randazza.html</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><u>Liberty Media Opposition Motion (Doc. 38)<br /></u></b></div>
"In an effort to <b>avoid payment </b>of the entire monetary component of the IAA, and before the<br />
IAA could be confirmed by the state court, Debtor, by and through its counsel L&Z, initiated<br />
settlement negotiations with E/L. During these negotiations, Debtor <b><span style="color: #990000;">consistently used the threat of</span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: #990000;">a bankruptcy petition </span></b>in an attempt to negotiate a sum of payment significantly reduced from that<br />
awarded to E/L in the IAA. <span style="color: blue;"><b>Not only did Debtor use the threat of bankruptcy as a cudgel, but he and</b></span><span style="color: blue;"><b>his allegedly estranged wife have initiated sealed divorce proceedings, and dissipated assets</b></span>."<br />
<br />
"Debtor attempted delay for two reasons: (1) in a misguided effort to stay the award of attorneys fees by the Arbitrator, as well as the confirmation of the IAA by the state court; and (2) to push the date of petition out more than 90 days, so that <b><span style="color: blue;">Debtor’s fraudulent, improper, and preferential transfers could not be clawed back, including payments to his attorneys L&Z</span></b>.<br />
<br />
According to Debtor’s schedules filed on September 11, 2015, Debtor has deposited with<br />
L&Z sums totaling $94,000. [ECF 15] On September 22, 2015, L&Z filed the instant Application<br />
to Employ and Retain Larson & Zirzow, LLC as Attorneys for the Debtor Nunc Pro Tunc to the<br />
Petition Date."<br />
<br />
"According to the retainer agreements and statements made therein, L&Z entered into<br />
representation of Debtor as of June 11, 2015 for “pre-bankruptcy settlement negotiations and to<br />
attend a settlement conference. The Debtor paid L&Z a flat fee of $10,000.00 for this engagement.”<br />
<br />
"L&Z also purports to have been retained, via two separate retainer agreements, for representation in both a bankruptcy action, and a potential adversary proceeding."<br />
<br />
"the second was for potential nondischargeability litigation. "<br />
<br />
"L&Z’s Application is deficient as it relates to exactly what the scope of services are that it<br />
has billed for as of yet. In fact, L&Z only informs as to the fact that it has received a total sum of<br />
$94,000 for legal services in connection with Debtor’s Chapter 11 case. “Of this sum, L&Z billed<br />
and was paid the sum of $26,908.82 prior to the Petition Date, and L&Z currently holds in trust the<br />
remainder sum of $67,091.18 <b><span style="color: blue;">(the “Remaining Retainer”) a portion of which has been allocated</span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">pursuant to the Representation Agreements for potential adversary proceedings.”</span></b> [ECF 18 at ¶16 (emphasis added)] This Application utterly fails to identify and delineate what services were<br />
provided totaling $26,908.82."<br />
<br />
"In any event, all transfers were made within 90 days of the filing of Debtor’s Petition. As<br />
such, the “pre-bankruptcy” retainer fees charged and collected by L&Z constitute an avoidable<br />
preferential transfer, and the funds must be clawed back to the estate. As a result, L&Z will lose<br />
their status as “disinterested parties” and are therefore not qualified to serve as attorneys for the<br />
Debtor.<br /><br />
II. L&Z’S APPLICATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE TEST FOR<br />
APPROVAL OF HIRING OF PROFESSIONALS.<br /><br />
L&Z’s employment as attorneys for the debtor in possession in a Chapter 11 case is<br />
governed by § 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires court approval for the attorney's<br />
employment. The bankruptcy court is charged with “ensur[ing] that attorneys who represent the<br />
debtor do so in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate.” In re Park–Helena Corp., 63 F.3d 877,<br />
880 (9th Cir.1995). Under § 327, an attorney for a debtor cannot “hold or represent an interest<br />
adverse to the estate”; he or she must be a “disinterested person.” 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).<br /><br />Any creditor of the estate, or anyone with “an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate ... by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the debtor,” is not a disinterested person. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(14)(A), (C). A “creditor” includes any “entity that has a<br />
claim against the debtor that arose at the time of or before the order for relief concerning the<br />
debtor.” § 101(10)(A). A “claim” includes any “right to payment.” § 101(5)(A).<br />
To enable the Bankruptcy Court to evaluate an attorney's potential employment, Rule<br />
2014(a) requires that an application for employment of an attorney under § 327 “shall be<br />
accompanied by a verified statement of the person to be employed setting forth the person's<br />
connections with the debtor, creditors, any other party in interest, their respective attorneys and<br />
accountants, the United States trustee, or any person employed in the office of the United States<br />
trustee.” Fed. R. Bankr.P. 2014(a). This disclosure requirement is applied “strictly.” Park–Helena,<br />
63 F.3d at 881.<br /><br />
An attorney approved for employment under § 327 must apply for interim or final<br />
compensation, which is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court. 11 U.S.C. §§ 328–31; see also<br />
In re Chapel Gate Apartments, Ltd., 64 B.R. 569, 575 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1986) (noting that “fees in<br />
bankruptcy cases ... are subject to review, modification, and outright cancellation by the Court”).<br />
Rule 2016(a) requires an attorney seeking compensation and/or reimbursement of expenses to file<br />
an application “setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the services rendered, time expended and<br />
expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.”<br />
<br />
The fee application must also include, inter alia, “a statement as to what payments have theretofore been made or promised to the applicant for services rendered or to be rendered in any capacity whatsoever in connection with the case, [and] the source of the compensation so paid or promised.” Id. After notice and a hearing, the court may award “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered,” as well as “reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses.” §330(a)(1)."<br />
<br />
Source and Full Filing<br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.38.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.38.0.pdf</a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b>Liberty Media Move for Order to Modify Stay</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 60-2 to above Motion</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.2.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.2.pdf</a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award Exhibit - 60-6</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.6.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.6.pdf</a></b><br />
<br />
<b>Liberty Media Reply</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.80.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.80.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>COMPLAINT by Liberty Media and Others to Determine Non-Dischargeable Debt</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.83.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.83.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Doc. 120 filed by Liberty Media, First Amended Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.120.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.120.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Case Docket</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 148 Settlement</b><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.148.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.148.0.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.157.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.157.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<b>EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING EXAMINATION</b><br />
<b>PURSUANT TO FED.R.BANKR.P.2004 OF MARC J. RANDAZZA</b><br />
<div>
Doc. 187</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
"Creditors Excelsior Media Corp. (“Excelsior”) and <b>Liberty Media Holdings, LLC</b><br />
(“Liberty” and together with Excelsior, “Creditors”), by and through their counsel, James D.<br />
Greene, Esq. of Greene Infuso, LLP pursuant to section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code and Rule<br />
2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 2004 of the Local Rules of<br />
Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure, hereby apply to the Court for entry of <b>order directing Debtor</b><br />
<b>Marc J. Randazza (“Debtor”) to appear for and submit to examination under oath</b> before certified court reporter at the office of Greene Infuso, LLP, 3030 South Jones Blvd. Suite 101, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 on a date and time to be determined, providing that notice of said examination is to be provided no less than 10 judicial days before such examination date. In support of this<br />
application (“Application”), Creditors state as follows:<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<b>LEGAL ARGUMENT</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
An examination pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 can be ordered [o]n motion of any</div>
<div>
party in interest.” In re Stasz, 387 B.R. 271, 273 n.3 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008); see also In re Lifeco</div>
<div>
Inv. Grp., Inc., 173 B.R. 478, 480 (Bankr. D. Del 1994), quoting Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004(a).</div>
<div>
Bankruptcy Rule 2004 further provides that the Court may order the examination and the</div>
<div>
production of documentary evidence concerning any matter that relates “to the liabilities and</div>
<div>
financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the</div>
<div>
debtor’s estate, or… any other matter relevant to the case or tot the formulation of a plan.” Fed.</div>
<div>
R. Bankr. P. 2004(b); see also In re Dinubilo, 177 B.R. 932, 936 n.6 (E.D. Cal. 1993) (noting that</div>
<div>
“[u]nder Rule 2004, a court may order the examination of any person on motion of any party in</div>
<div>
interest.”). </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Generally, examinations under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 are for the “purpose of</div>
<div>
discovering assets and unearthing frauds.” In re Rafsky, 300 B.R. 152, 153 n.2 (Bankr. D. Conn.</div>
<div>
2003) (citation omitted); In re N. Plaza LLC, 395 B.R. 113, 122 n.9 (S.D. Cal. 2008).</div>
<div>
The scope of a Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination is “unfettered and broad,” as the plain</div>
<div>
language of the rule indicates. See 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2004.02[1] at 2004-6 (15th ed. Rev.</div>
<div>
1997); In re Dinublilo, 177 B. R. at 939 quoting In re GHR Energy Corp., 33 B.R. 451, 453</div>
<div>
(Bankr. D. Mass. 1983). </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The broad latitude of Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination furthers the purpose of the rule, which is “to allow the court to gain a clear picture of the condition and the whereabouts of the bankrupt’s estate. In re Int’l Fibercom, Inc., 283 B.R. 290, 292 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2002) (permitted Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination aimed at “obtaining information that will … potentially uncover additional claims that may exist for the benefit of the estate”); see also In re W & S Investments, Inc., 985 F.2d 577 (9th Cir. 1993) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004 is a broadly construed discovery device…”); In re French, 145 B. R 991, 992 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1992) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004… does not offer the procedural safeguards available under Rule 26 of the Federal Rule Rules of Civil Procedure.”)."</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"The information and documents which Creditors seek through this Application relate to</div>
<div>
matters that are clearly with the permitted scope of Rule 2004, including: (i) property of the</div>
<div>
Debtor’s bankruptcy estate; (ii) transactions and business dealings involving the Debtor and</div>
<div>
family members and corporate entities; (iii) potential claims <b><span style="color: blue;">the Creditor may have against third</span></b></div>
<div>
<b><span style="color: blue;">parties;</span></b> and (iv) other matters affecting the administration of the Debtor’s estate."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Source and Full Document</div>
<div>
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.187.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.187.0.pdf</a></div>
<br />
<b>Above Order Granted</b><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.188.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.188.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 191 Liberty Media SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT</b><br />
<b>OF MOTION FOR ORDER </b><b>CONFIRMING INTERIM</b><b>ARBITRATION AWARD</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.191.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.191.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">CAN YOU SAY PATTERN AND HISTORY ???</span></b><br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-83134654125779335242017-10-25T09:53:00.002-07:002017-10-25T09:53:27.051-07:00Ever Wonder how to Use a TRO to Steal Online Content, Intellectual Property, Someone's Work Product and Proprietary Methods? And completely IGNORE the First Amendment? Wonder No More. Let Attorney Marc Randazza Show you the Way. How to Side Step that Pesky First Amendment by using an Unconstitutional TRO, inspired by my former Unconstitutional, First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Attorney Ronald Green and the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm.<br /><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoX2oMQbDPqyEKh7K5VunhlwtkowJdRxp-xr0uuTrukgCRr4NPDj3dqe1p_IRWTC4izr7I7RZYiN-2o6GEIVr54uKv57QVy1FWTOWquIwP502uZXw8oLqdl_VYUbEQMpjkiPp1M0HLsbM/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoX2oMQbDPqyEKh7K5VunhlwtkowJdRxp-xr0uuTrukgCRr4NPDj3dqe1p_IRWTC4izr7I7RZYiN-2o6GEIVr54uKv57QVy1FWTOWquIwP502uZXw8oLqdl_VYUbEQMpjkiPp1M0HLsbM/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Detailed Step By Step How To Coming Soon</span></b></div>
<br />
Check out the Court Ruling Below whereby Randazza successfully WON is argument that A TRO is Unconstitutional.<br />
<br />
"No. 3D12-3189 Lower Tribunal No. 11-17842,<br />
<br />
Irina Chevaldina, Appellant,<br />
vs.<br />
R.K./FL Management, Inc., et al.,Appellee"<br />
<br />
<a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" target="_blank">http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFDOcL3EjXEio-32eZB5ruf38vJlQf4SJ1GRigDHYyrYML4nNbT7eylb1hI4bVcgXv9jaUHFNWBZbLgCObm1NpsuHsWrHwOUaDcklpgVMsF8-YNBR3HfvRJ6vRgUkniHu7cZX2XsG5QU8/s1600/unconstitutional.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="427" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFDOcL3EjXEio-32eZB5ruf38vJlQf4SJ1GRigDHYyrYML4nNbT7eylb1hI4bVcgXv9jaUHFNWBZbLgCObm1NpsuHsWrHwOUaDcklpgVMsF8-YNBR3HfvRJ6vRgUkniHu7cZX2XsG5QU8/s1600/unconstitutional.png" /></a></div>
<br />
Absolutely Unconstitutional TRO Motion filed by my former attorney Marc Randazza. He was successful in using this Unconstitutional TRO to steal my intellectual property, my work product, my search engine placement, my online content, and flat out steal blogs and domain names with NO First Amendment Adjudication whatsoever<br />
<br />
Click Below to Read, and You too Can STEAL Content, Search Engine Placement and Intellectual Property via a TRO.<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/Case%202:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL%20Document%202%20Filed%2011/28/12" target="_blank">Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Document 2 Filed 11/28/12</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzWzxpSwoEp3VRqhVaVmm_xaljiNQSR6umG6N2B_iZAZvTefCp3bymCjgelw-QWtnR-73k9doWna8wOUVGdDZ2ELcKdMg_Er4Iix84xc0aiD_Xfcgw2CrXhcyAMLIvT05_SjS_WAdX1gA/s1600/images.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="158" data-original-width="280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzWzxpSwoEp3VRqhVaVmm_xaljiNQSR6umG6N2B_iZAZvTefCp3bymCjgelw-QWtnR-73k9doWna8wOUVGdDZ2ELcKdMg_Er4Iix84xc0aiD_Xfcgw2CrXhcyAMLIvT05_SjS_WAdX1gA/s1600/images.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<b>Also Check Out links below for Tips and Trick to use the Power of the Courts to your Benefit. No worry about those bad reviews or Gripe Sites, just get a TRO and WaLa you OWN the Constitutional Rights and Property of anyone you please. </b><br />
<br />
"First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS that Preliminary Injunctions are unconstitutional, they are unlawful prior restraint, they are "patently unconstitutional", they are clearly an "unconstitutional remedy". Especially if there was no prior First Amendment Adjudication."<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIyE28wGgywGn79vNB8pyweMqrukCc5M_tKhU7KKCaRWMSv2Qs2wWHvIpUKSrKf5bgIMji0lbWfJ3m3rJjxq9xuzzYTGkqmQLuF6FcOiioaUW8_-87gkuGD_n2dNDUDeTBx0TWBkutq44/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="195" data-original-width="259" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIyE28wGgywGn79vNB8pyweMqrukCc5M_tKhU7KKCaRWMSv2Qs2wWHvIpUKSrKf5bgIMji0lbWfJ3m3rJjxq9xuzzYTGkqmQLuF6FcOiioaUW8_-87gkuGD_n2dNDUDeTBx0TWBkutq44/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
"Pro Se Litigant Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Pokes a BIT of FUN at the OUTBREAK of Preliminary Injunctions, Sweeping Rapidly, Seemingly Out of Control, through the District of Nevada, yet Granny Goose Alleges these RULINGS are an "extraordinary remedy". Crystal Cox Calls BULLSHIT. ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON ~ Randazza V. Cox, Who Will be NEXT?"<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUPijCUEmfUNx7l6TRB3EObr9_u7j279UEFBFUlG8Os7Z6W6kGl02KeSrnDaSloVMCPc8gr-ly3ylD-hQhLw9dKlvT2Oi93p6pJzRmK5CrOige5lLpoRJAh-Z-H1SXsP2kDkEWeTsRy_I/s1600/First+Amendment+Protection+Violated+by+Marc+Randazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="219" data-original-width="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUPijCUEmfUNx7l6TRB3EObr9_u7j279UEFBFUlG8Os7Z6W6kGl02KeSrnDaSloVMCPc8gr-ly3ylD-hQhLw9dKlvT2Oi93p6pJzRmK5CrOige5lLpoRJAh-Z-H1SXsP2kDkEWeTsRy_I/s1600/First+Amendment+Protection+Violated+by+Marc+Randazza.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
"Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh in ALLEGED Free Speech Rights, While Marc Randazza TAKES away the Rights of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of ALL Bloggers and Citizens Journalists."<br />
<a href="http://whistleblowermediacrystalcox.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-defends-rush-limbaugh-in.html" target="_blank">http://whistleblowermediacrystalcox.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-defends-rush-limbaugh-in.html</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcBOX-3gYw4QAg9GgL7zgrhyphenhyphengiBG4-Cse3pk4qLQzBL4j0js7Xd1KTmBFFur7d5Iew-FGWhBYpjP3H_6rEJ-LncGUCgEerEWp02TZJoU9L9yZTHmTfDhNxUtT9ZnRHuiyYgPWhyphenhyphenowT0qo/s1600/images+%25285%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="247" data-original-width="204" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcBOX-3gYw4QAg9GgL7zgrhyphenhyphengiBG4-Cse3pk4qLQzBL4j0js7Xd1KTmBFFur7d5Iew-FGWhBYpjP3H_6rEJ-LncGUCgEerEWp02TZJoU9L9yZTHmTfDhNxUtT9ZnRHuiyYgPWhyphenhyphenowT0qo/s1600/images+%25285%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza SUES blogger Crystal L. Cox to Suppress her Speech. 5 years later wants her to pay his legal fees for his Unconstitutional Retaliatory Lawsuit against her. $350,000 to SUE a Blogger over a $10 Domain Name that Trademark Attorney, Domain Name, First Amendment Expert Marc Randazza was to damn dumb to buy. WOW. Check out these BILLS folks. All to suppress the speech of someone speaking critical of big baby Marc Randazza.<br />
<a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-j.html" target="_blank">http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-j.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPJxYViFBB4fTzD0YfgSyI7rVwkxcp6gkzXQozArq3D8ctvmhkS_eGX8ok9Nvp-9GEa-wJPShbEX7gUafegK-OFx-c3amtiyoZ0P3as_8VvsaHyG5__vm_JEfEhArQLqSXvyZjc-XKnyU/s1600/images+%25281%2529+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="180" data-original-width="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPJxYViFBB4fTzD0YfgSyI7rVwkxcp6gkzXQozArq3D8ctvmhkS_eGX8ok9Nvp-9GEa-wJPShbEX7gUafegK-OFx-c3amtiyoZ0P3as_8VvsaHyG5__vm_JEfEhArQLqSXvyZjc-XKnyU/s1600/images+%25281%2529+%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
A Trademark Attorney, First Amendment Expert SUES a former client claiming a Trademark Infringement on Gripe Sites.<br />
<a href="https://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-trademark-attorney-first-amendment.html" target="_blank">https://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-trademark-attorney-first-amendment.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Oh and Don't Miss the Infamous Kaplan Letter where Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group really lay it on thick. (The opposite argument he made in suing me, Crystal Cox, his former client.)<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiZEFJQW95MXNFQUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiZEFJQW95MXNFQUU/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
<b>Much more Details Coming soon, so that you to Can use the Power and Privilege of our Court System to get a TRO against your enemy speaking critical of you and not have to concern yourself with the First Amendment or any kind of actual factual due process. </b><br />
<b><br /></b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-52105897974442130122017-10-20T22:11:00.001-07:002017-10-20T22:11:56.876-07:00First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza SUES blogger Crystal L. Cox to Suppress her Speech. 5 years later wants her to pay his legal fees for his Unconstitutional Retaliatory Law Suit against her. $350,000 to SUE a Blogger over a $10 Domain Name that Trademark Attorney, Domain Name, First Amendment Expert Marc Randazza was to damn dumb to buy. WOW. Check out these BILLS folks. All to suppress the speech of someone speaking critical of big baby Marc Randazza.<b>Retaliatory RIPOFF RAT Ronald Green</b> sure does charge his partner, partners wife and child a WHOLE lot of money for RETALIATION against a Whistleblower exposing him and speaking critical of him. WOW 262k and counting to TRY and take away my First Amendment Rights. What a Bunch of EVIL Dirty Jackasses.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPrj8YmU_gJu0f-i4KFKqMO-oXRxWxiwx6ZxboXy4EkbF42PYAQCdUiXOF_6ng17b-UFsxYI1NATvIm0P6phbPebB6AeXlTtgEx8m9Rj2x6VEEayYtxZoaibT50M5CEbP1efw9swD1b_Y/s1600/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="506" data-original-width="900" height="223" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPrj8YmU_gJu0f-i4KFKqMO-oXRxWxiwx6ZxboXy4EkbF42PYAQCdUiXOF_6ng17b-UFsxYI1NATvIm0P6phbPebB6AeXlTtgEx8m9Rj2x6VEEayYtxZoaibT50M5CEbP1efw9swD1b_Y/s400/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
CHECK OUT<b> THIS 262,000 BILL</b>. wow.. HATE TO SEE WHAT HE CHARGES ATTORNEYS THAT ARE NOT HIS PARTNER OR BOSS...<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUlh4MlpYdjAxOVk/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUlh4MlpYdjAxOVk/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
And Check out<b> this 111,000 bill</b> .. WOW. Sure cost alot to SUE a blogger for calling you names.<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMGdRSGRPZVMzLVE/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMGdRSGRPZVMzLVE/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqI6f5Ko9_-YSbBI3yxNjmPl61Gcx2_YuMvUk8efdhkjeCfVGOlsvH8ewtelf_v8rIMiYg7vZEbTomHI9BizoFInT7dzwOovmO8GNeVdtL_VJIpYLQNV4C3WkK3xyctZXRtan7SeMp0UA/s1600/r1112488-dctau7-sn5ymsls9c.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="642" data-original-width="1024" height="250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqI6f5Ko9_-YSbBI3yxNjmPl61Gcx2_YuMvUk8efdhkjeCfVGOlsvH8ewtelf_v8rIMiYg7vZEbTomHI9BizoFInT7dzwOovmO8GNeVdtL_VJIpYLQNV4C3WkK3xyctZXRtan7SeMp0UA/s400/r1112488-dctau7-sn5ymsls9c.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Also Check Out</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://UnethicalScumattorney.blogspot.com/</a></b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Marc Randazza</b></span></a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-9894912871791306192017-08-07T20:23:00.001-07:002017-08-07T20:23:24.367-07:00Attorney Marc Randazza is a Gang Stalking Online expert indeed. He works with gangs of attorneys that harass people online and RUIN lives.I notified the courts, the authorities, the FBI long ago.When <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> does not agree with your <b>"content"</b> he simply gets an UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRO to Suppress your Speech. Marc Randazza Simply gets Godaddy, Google, and the Courts to take your websites, steal your domain names and simply remove you from the search engines. He takes your domain names and websites and redirects them to his blog page defaming you.<br />
<br />
When you Speak Critical of <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> he gets his gang stalking attorneys (internet trolls) to stalk you, to post hate about you, to threaten you physical harm, to ruin your business friendships and life in general and they do this for years on end. Some of their victims kill themselves, and they press them to do it.<br />
<br />
Marc Randazza will NOT allow you to speak critical of him. Well and go on about your life that is. His gang stalking trolls are mostly attorneys, so they post in law magazines, they file amicus briefs in federal court, they conspire with attorneys in any case you may be in, they network at every level to discredit you, meanwhile they text you and threaten and intimidate you constantly.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> will sue you so he can get phone numbers you called, your bank information and depose family, friends and clients and stalk you some more with all that knowledge.<br />
<br />
These gang stalkers including attorneys, law websites, and lot's more, well they have "clout" you see, and they go on Fox news, NPR, and interview with FORBES and they make sure to ruin YOUR LIFE with lies, as the scumbag gang stalking attorney is taken "SERIOUS" and you are simply "Dismissed".<br />
<br />
I am Glad to here about the latest case Monica Foster talks about in the video below. I pray this will shed a whole lot of LIGHT and "Crystal Clear" precedent.<br />
<br />
Also Check Out the <a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">Randazza vs. Cox case in Nevada</a>, some of the motions discuss the TRO and how Marc Randazza deals with Free Speech he does not like. ALL the blogs, websites, domain names in Marc's complaint and more intellectual property was simply TAKEN by Marc Randazza. No Trial, no Jury, no Judgement, just an Unconstitutional TRO. Check it out.<br />
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
Click Below to Read my Complaint against Marc Randazza and the Gang, to the best of my Pro Se ability to fight back<br />
<a href="http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">Emotional Distress, Invasion of Privacy, and Intimidation.</span></b> Incite Hate and Stalking. This is EXACTLY what Marc Randazza and his gang stalking attorneys do. They also use so called <b>"credible" </b>outlets to trash who they don't like or agree with or who will not do as they say. They did it to ME, they did to Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and countless others. This legal action is AMAZING. Of course Marc is representing the guy, if the guy loses Marc and his buddies lose the ONLY way they win case, by gang stalking harassing those in the cases they want to LOSE so they can set a precedent for THEMSELVES.<br />
<br />
Thank you Alexandra Mayers for your continued work in shedding light on this VERY important Issue that has harmed so many.<br />
<br />
<b>Alexandra Mayers LIVE: </b><br />
Does the lawyer defending neo-nazi troll <b>Andrew Anglin</b> know where he is?<br />
<br />
<div style="height: 0px; padding-bottom: 367.313px; position: relative;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-7GUmFBUm_Y?ecver=2" style="height: 367.313px; left: 0px; position: absolute; width: 653px;" width="640"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-27642228326967993642017-04-27T08:59:00.001-07:002017-04-27T08:59:07.237-07:00Marc Randazza had a Reckless Disregard for the TRUTH when, with ACTUAL MALICE, he maliciously DEFAMED his former client Crystal L. Cox. He KNEW for a FACT that what he was posting was NOT TRUE. Yet he Defamed me, Crystal Cox, his former client with ACTUAL MALICE.Marc Randazza continues to be a hypocrite and seriously Full of SHIT. It is EASY to prove Marc Randazza knew he was flat out LYING about Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein. I told him and sent him documents and he flat out lied to courts, national radio stations, blogs and the public at large WITH ACTUAL MALICE. Yet he was rewarded with top of the search engine domain names. Marc Randazza tortures, defames, harasses clients and whom ever he pleases, knowing full well of the ACTUAL truth. He does this to get his way, to win case, to set legal precedents and yet is above the law.<br />
<br />
He violates his clients rights and defames private individuals and public figures and with ACTUAL Malice. No one has a case against Marc Randazza because he is slippery and in my OPINION corrupt and has Judges in his pocket and corner for whatever reason.<br />
<br />
It is rumored that Randazza is one of the porn guys that started the rumor that Melania was an Escort as a model before marrying Trump. Oh well can't trust the rumor mill right?<br />
<br />
Certainly <b>CANNOT Trust Marc Randazza</b><br />
<br />
Marc Randazza DOES NOT believe I have a right to disagree. HE DESTROYS the lives of woman who disagree with him or speak unfriendly about him.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">MARC RANDAZZA DOES NOT ENDORSE YOUR RIGHT TO MAKE "STATEMENTS".</span></b><br />
<br />
This Video is Flat out LIES to get clients by a washed up, bankrupt, corrupt, bully, abusive, malicious attorney who is constantly HYPOCRITICAL. Don't believe a word he says. It is only an Advertisement and in NO Way should be taken as ACTUAL facts about Times vs. Sullivan, the First Amendment or your RIGHT to trash talk your human rights violating, corrupt, bullying attorney.<br />
<br />
Marc Randazza LIED to WIPO and stole mass domain names, wiped out massive web content, STOLE intellectual property, and ruined my life and business as well as put me in constant stress and threats from his lies to the courts, and other entities regarding myself and Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Marc Randazza used his influence to STOMP Free SPEECH rights and Steal Intellectual Property and he did so KNOWING full well that what he was saying, swearing to and posting was false. He KNEW the facts and with ACTUAL Malice spread Defamatory LIES.<br />
<br />
Mark Randazz: : You Can Learn From People You Don't Agree With<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3teOQvwLmkY" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3teOQvwLmkY</a><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: x-large;">WHAT A CROCK OF SHIT</span></b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-38201149729639832942016-08-14T15:54:00.001-07:002016-08-14T15:54:29.511-07:00Sue Sue Sue. Chill Speech Chill Speech. First Amendment Attorney, Law Firm Randazza Legal Group LOVES to SUE people to SILENCE them. And all in the Name of Free Speech. Meanwhile he hides behind a bankruptcy court in Cox v. Randazza, with NO end in sight. <b>Porn Blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother </b>THREATENS to Sue Monica Foster. oH and for FREE with us of Unconstitutional, Unethical attorney Marc Randazza of Rabid Randazza Legal Group.<br /><br />There are so many people that Marc Randazza has offered to represent for FREE to Silence Free Speech that exposes him. oh and to RETALIATE. Meanwhile he does not even have the stamina to stay in legal cases with us, he has to HIDE in bankruptcy court while doing FREE legal work out of unethical SPITE.<br />
<br />
So, this Guy, Mike South aka Michael Strother, calls himself a PIMP and then threatens to Sue others who call him a Pimp too? WTF<br />
<br />
<img height="418" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlfuOGXkM7WCKYfSP2CBCd5fEThU95edJRKr4bJ7PIZN5NppifMSM3TWMFJZSux2mCKbE7Km4GOZf3DA8Uxu4Cfp55S5uMClss0Osbf17nMm73DxGidqB4ZdkY0fZ7GovKJRAouXOVcbY/s640/the+win+tweet.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white;">"<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">How in the hell would Randazza Legal Group attorneys (</span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHjZutIAbF0" style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">who've already filed one fraudulent lawsuit against me in regards to Jennifer Randazza's attachment to organized crime</a><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">) and Michael Strother explain the above to a Judge? In addition how will Randazza Legal Group explain to a Judge that they are offering their legal services pro-bono to self labeled PIMPS (who are not owners and/or operators of legal brothels in Nevada) - all in effort to silence individuals who have opted to share the truth about sex trafficking and the adult entertainment industry?</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">According to wikipedia and many other sources - a pimp is a sex trafficker.</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking%C2%A0" style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking </a><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp" style="text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Definition of “PIMP” according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary</a>: a criminal who is associated with, usually exerts control over, and lives off the earnings of one or more prostitutes<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp" style="text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp</a></b><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">I will not be apologizing to Mike South aka Michael Strother. In addition, he will not be suing me for "libel", as his entire proposed lawsuit has no legitimacy or merit.</span><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">I encourage you all to read and sign this petition I wrote, just a day prior to Mike South aka Michael Strother's lawsuit threat: <a href="https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars" style="text-decoration: none;">https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars</a>"</b></span><br />
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">Source of Above</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f" target="_blank">http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f</a></b></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><div>
<b>Mike South aka Michael Strother has threatened to sue me for my stating what he's labeled himself as - a PIMP</b><br /></div>
<div>
On August 13, 2016 veteran porn blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother stated that he would take <b><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's offer to sue me (apparently Randazza offered his legal services to Strother pro-bono)</span></b>. Strother indicated that he would sue me for "libel" because I claimed that he is a pimp and involved in sex trafficking.<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiC9Okp67OhNVkT5Q0dorczKJNkw4TpCGjF0hm8pScH8eam2-X7kd5NulIqOXbANAM-HFAQZ2NASy4kn4e7cwbgVT0KsaWkrxBJ4mrXS1AnppYCccWP63HIlh4_lVit-tiXljB5W_6JPss/s1600/lawsuit+threat.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiC9Okp67OhNVkT5Q0dorczKJNkw4TpCGjF0hm8pScH8eam2-X7kd5NulIqOXbANAM-HFAQZ2NASy4kn4e7cwbgVT0KsaWkrxBJ4mrXS1AnppYCccWP63HIlh4_lVit-tiXljB5W_6JPss/s1600/lawsuit+threat.jpg" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</span></div>
<div>
<b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">Source of Above</b></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f" target="_blank">http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f</a></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;">I wonder what Marc Randazza's Creditors think of all his Pro Bono legal cases he offers and takes, and all in the name of REVENGE and nothing to do with Justice or making money to pay off his CREDITORS. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html</a></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Randazza vs. Crystal Cox Free Speech Suppression Case Docket</div>
<div>
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-91135398950234328762016-07-27T01:01:00.001-07:002016-07-27T01:01:54.472-07:00Foxx and Foster - Racist threats attached to The Luxury Companion, Pornwikileaks & Randazza<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/si6O3pR3Ca8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-44101450864511155762016-05-20T01:38:00.001-07:002016-05-20T01:38:02.092-07:00Marc Randazza, Hypocritical Attorney representing another DISGUSTING, Unethical Attorney just like him. Marc Randazza seems to say when you are offended, called names, and well abused then you should be an ADULT and Shrug it OFF.Why is this ASSHOLE still an attorney? Can't Judges, Attorney General's, Detectives, the DOJ, or any authority READ. Marc Randazza has CLEARLY violated the rights of client after client. He defends pedophiles, and should be indicted as far as I see it. Yet he is still YAPPING as if what he says has ANY credibility.<br /><br />
<b>" Feldman regrets “demonstrating a lack of impulse control” in sending the email."</b><br />
<br />
Source<br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/05/12/end-yourselves-councilwomen-threatened-after-voting-against-seattles-nba-arena/" target="_blank">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/05/12/end-yourselves-councilwomen-threatened-after-voting-against-seattles-nba-arena/</a><br /><br />
Oh ya Marc Randazza clients can email whatever they want. But if Crystal Cox emails an attorney, acting as her own attorney, in a PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL settlement agreement, then that is EXTORTION and Marc Randazza shouts from every rooftop and in every big media that will listen that she is an Extortionist. And he published my private email in mass, knowing it was being painted in false light as he had acted as my attorney. That private email was made to be EVIL and Randazza can ruin lives, flat out lie about whoever he wants, threaten people and say whatever LIE he wants and that is ok, legal and ethical??<br /><br />But oh yeah my client is abusive, and an asshole like me but he is sorry, so sorry.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD7_T21fd5ln9hm3AEZTUNh6E7jqWIwuFYzITTSsfjd3kNe2ppnDnq8EPwcvGoPTsFf-iE32kxKgkLrXobHOq-CIgdthF9jcHF3Pv8YdBOFvo6Tn1g5A6AzU9_MjMHGVMEGbop6lk6rK0/s1600/unconstitutional-double-standard-index.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD7_T21fd5ln9hm3AEZTUNh6E7jqWIwuFYzITTSsfjd3kNe2ppnDnq8EPwcvGoPTsFf-iE32kxKgkLrXobHOq-CIgdthF9jcHF3Pv8YdBOFvo6Tn1g5A6AzU9_MjMHGVMEGbop6lk6rK0/s1600/unconstitutional-double-standard-index.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />FUCK You Marc Randazza. IT IS NOT ok for you to RUIN LIVES with your LIES. Why do you still have a license to represent clients?? WOW.<br /><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>"Attorney admits emails to female city councilmembers were 'abusive,' apologizes"</b></div>
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b>
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">"“He has come to realize that his reactions, and the communications he sent, were over the top, and that his tendency to this kind of behavior is a long-standing problem,”</span></b> said Marc J. Randazza, a First Amendment attorney who represents Jason M. Feldman, in a statement. “He unequivocally apologizes to the recipients of his abusive comments.”<br /><br />Source of this Marc Randazza, Hyprocrite ASSHOLE Attorney quote<br /><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html" target="_blank">http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html</a><br />
<br />
"“As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways to quickly and painfully end yourselves,” the email said. “Each of you should rot in hell for what you took from me yesterday.”<br />
<br />
<b>Randazza – who last week suggested the councilmembers<span style="color: blue;"> should do “what an adult would do” and shrug it off </span>– said Feldman is seeking help from mental health professionals.</b><br />
<br />
“This event has forced him to confront his impulse control issues,” the statement said. “After consulting with professionals, friends, and family, he recognizes that he has a problem and that that problem has hurt other people – not just in this circumstance, but in multiple occasions in the past.”<br /><br />Source<br /><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html" target="_blank">http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html</a><br />
<br />
Fucktard Hypocritical Mean, Evil Marc Randazza says <b>do what an adult should do and shrug it off??? </b>WOW WTF? Marc Randazza ruined massive lives, sued so many people, threatened us, ruined our lives or relationships or reputations, harassed us, attacked us, demeaned us, exposed our private lives, gave out our home address and more private information, stole massive intellectual property, incited massive hate against us, and all we did was call his wife a slut and make fun of him, and buy a few domain names. <b>WHY DIDN'T Marc Randazza JUST ACT LIKE AN ADULT AND SHRUG IT OFF?</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW2jORn-6-1jH0hn49G4WokYOxO0LvfEhvG9vF2_ZaoxLHNz4ROYc6w-vtYLIs8HtKnkkqbQ2GTk8UibbHJmF_MwfCysx4AloxbzeB5MTqsX1nMX0W0JlUk0HqQk-N0lFW_bcHBtl8vwg/s1600/unconstitutional.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW2jORn-6-1jH0hn49G4WokYOxO0LvfEhvG9vF2_ZaoxLHNz4ROYc6w-vtYLIs8HtKnkkqbQ2GTk8UibbHJmF_MwfCysx4AloxbzeB5MTqsX1nMX0W0JlUk0HqQk-N0lFW_bcHBtl8vwg/s1600/unconstitutional.png" /></a><br /><b><br /></b></div>
<b>Marc Randazza is the MOST Hypocritical, Unethical, Unconstitutional Attorney in the WORLD. </b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-90096245719651485872016-05-11T16:01:00.001-07:002016-05-11T16:01:51.654-07:00Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza have NO CASE against Crystal Cox or Eliot Bernstein. And they NEVER had a case. Yet they managed to STEAL massive online content and search engine placement and to redirect that intellectual property to hate sites and defamatory sites about the defendants they sued. This is NOT OK, NOT Ethical and Not Legal. But WOW now there is precedent so you too can STEAL Domain Names, SEO, Search Engine Placement, Intellectual Property and Online Speech you don't Like.<b>Read the<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view" target="_blank"> DENIAL of the Summary Judgement</a> which CLEARLY Shows that <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> and <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> have NO Case against Blogger Crystal L. Cox or iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf">http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020140411A31/RANDAZZA%20v.%20COX" target="_blank">http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020140411A31/RANDAZZA%20v.%20COX</a><br />
<br />
AND<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view</a><br />
<br />
<b>I put a few links to the same document, because <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a>'s CRONIES change links to CHILL SPEECH and alter reality.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-1cRn8SNNlcy1NJT96XZzlY3NBUBnTXy3uvR_5xgsG_4O8fea19fPY1CP2VGub2LW9nLkyCVLBj6_BIofnEDOuOMYSVBNZxsLyp_YYOjfg2bV4P8LZrOEMhl4GVULKAURFDK2Z3fu6n4/s1600/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="359" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-1cRn8SNNlcy1NJT96XZzlY3NBUBnTXy3uvR_5xgsG_4O8fea19fPY1CP2VGub2LW9nLkyCVLBj6_BIofnEDOuOMYSVBNZxsLyp_YYOjfg2bV4P8LZrOEMhl4GVULKAURFDK2Z3fu6n4/s640/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<b><br /></b>
<br />
Full Docket Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza, Babydazza Vs. Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein<br />
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
Study Every Document and Filing and LEARN How Unethical Attorneys WORK the SYSTEM, Chill Online Speech, Shut down blogs they don't like, Steal Search Engine Placement, bully and harass litigants<br />
<br />
Use the Docket Above to SHUT DOWN ANY Online Speech You don't Like. Just Like the District of Nevada let Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza, along with Attorney Ronald Green and their Law Firm Randazza Legal Group and WITH No Liability or Accountability what so ever.<br />
<br />
oh and if the people you STEAL from or shut down their speech put up to much of a fight and want to sue you for Liable, for Defamation, for Misrepresentation NO Problem, File for Bankruptcy, to Learn how study the Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Docket and related information.<br />
<a href="http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
oh and don't forget if you don't like an online parody about you or a whistleblower or insider exposing you or making fun of you, then you can simply use the Nevada State Courts, check out <b>Randazza vs. Monica Foster, Alexandra Mayers in Clark County Nevada. </b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/tag/clark-county/" target="_blank">http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/tag/clark-county/</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/2014/05/17/the-lawsuits-alexandra-mayers-aka-monica-foster-is-facing-the-truth-of-the-porn-industry-organized-crime/" target="_blank">http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/2014/05/17/the-lawsuits-alexandra-mayers-aka-monica-foster-is-facing-the-truth-of-the-porn-industry-organized-crime/</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/statement-attorney-Ronald-D-Green-aka-Jamieprofit-twitter-stalker-UNETHICAL.pdf" target="_blank">http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/statement-attorney-Ronald-D-Green-aka-Jamieprofit-twitter-stalker-UNETHICAL.pdf</a><br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-70138837377944861652016-04-11T20:46:00.001-07:002016-04-11T20:46:17.378-07:00Marc Randazza DOES Bully People to Suppress their Speech. He did that to me, Crystal Cox and to Whistleblower Alexandra Mayers and to Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Senate Bill 444 Nevada and the unethical, unconstitutional attorney Marc Randazza who advocates the bill and helped write the Nevada SLAPP Law.<span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Marc Randazza is flat out full of shit in his testimony regarding this Senate Bill. Anyone that can read all the details of Randazza v. Cox or Randazza v. Mayers can clearly see that he is a First Amendment BULLY Flat out.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is his SHADY, Bullshit Testimony</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=104&v=jajveO6eahM" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=104&v=jajveO6eahM</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza SHOULD be Liable to me and his other victims. </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Marc Randazza uses the SLAPP Laws to Bully People such as me, Crystal Cox. </b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">IT IS my RIGHT to SUE Marc Randazza and NOT his right to use Nevada SLAPP to STOMP my constitutional rights to counterclaim, to sue my former attorney.</span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is Randazza v. Cox</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">I, Crystal Cox have Proved that there is CLEAR and Convincing Evidence that Marc Randazza knowingly posted false information about me WORLDWIDE. He is liable to me for this and is using Nevada SLAPP to protect himself as my former attorney to defame me.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Attorney Marc Randazza uses his power in the courts to file a defaming, flat out lying legal action against his former client AND then use those files to file other legal actions, complaints and a worldwide defamatory campaign.</span></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada SLAPP </a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Suit to Chill the Speech of Blogger Crystal Cox, Speaking CRITICAL of asshole, rogue, lawless attorney Marc Randazza of</span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.261.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"> Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Defendant Crystal Cox's Affirmative Defense in the ALLEGATIONS against her by her her former attorney </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf</a><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: underline;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: underline;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<u><b><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf" style="color: blue; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">First Amendment Trumps Trademark Law</a><span style="line-height: 18.2px;">, Randazza should have known that.</span></b></u></div>
<u style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></u><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Trademark Law should NOT be used to TRAMPLE First Amendment Rights</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.268.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Attorney </span><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.ie/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> claims to the courts that he did not represent Crystal Cox, yet he discussed the case with attorney Eugene Volokh and claimed to be representing me, and even discussed filing motions and get court transcripts in moving forward.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Eugene eMail to Cox</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.263.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.263.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">eMail between Cox, Volokh and Randazza,</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> Clearly showing that Randazza and Volokh were acting as Cox's attorney and discussing court motions and transcripts moving forward, and keeping the client, me, in the loop.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.258.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.258.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.261.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza </a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> lied to the world deliberately painting Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein to be criminals, felony extortionist. Yet clearly as seen below </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> did not, himself believe he was being EXTORTED in any way, but that Cox was only asking for a job, and being unreasonable in his opinion.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.261.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.261.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.259.0.pdf" style="color: blue; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTTEzU3AycUJ5RTA/edit" style="color: blue; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="line-height: 18.2px;"> agrees to represent Crystal Cox, yet LIES in sworn statements to the court that he did indeed represent me.</span></span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.259.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.259.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<u><br /></u></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b style="line-height: 18.2px;"><u><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada Bar Complaint</a> I filed against <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> - <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a></u></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">My personal Experience with Marc Randazza as my Lawyer</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-personal-experience-with-nevada.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-personal-experience-with-nevada.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">For more Check Out the Links Below</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/crystal-cox-counterclaims-declaration.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/crystal-cox-counterclaims-declaration.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Nevada SLAPP Case where Marc Randazza sued me, Crystal Cox to SUPRESS my SPEECH and take my online sites speaking critical of him, then when I counter claim he uses Nevada SLAPP.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"Randazza first moves to dismiss Cox’s counterclaims under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law, NRS 41.660"</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Marc Randazza filed a SLAPP lawsuit against his former client Crystal Cox to suppress her speech. Yet he tries to claim SLAPP as a defense against her defamation and malpractice claim. And does this wayyyy after she filed those claims.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Court Says, </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"I find Randazza’s special motion to dismiss was not filed by NRS 41.660’s 60-day deadline and that the filing delay is not supported by good cause. I therefore deny the special motion to dismiss. I also deny Randazza’s motion to strike Cox’s answer and enter default because claimdispositive sanctions are presently unwarranted. Cox has not been explicitly warned that such sanctions could issue if she continues to disregard court rules and file frivolous motions, and I decline to take such a draconian step without first warning her of this possibility."</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">THE COURT DENIED RANDAZZA MOTIONS TO DISMISS COX'S COUNTERCLAIM OVER AND OVER. YET HE DESPERATELY KEEPS BEGGING FOR ANOTHER WAY.</span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">COURT SAYS; </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"A. Special Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 224] Randazza specially moves for dismissal of Cox’s remaining </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">counterclaims for defamation and malpractice</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> under NRS 41.660, which provides protections for defendants in </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP)</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Succinctly, “[</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">A SLAPP claimant typically seeks </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">“to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned.”</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">5 NRS 41.660 provides a special, expedited procedure for obtaining the dismissal of SLAPP suits.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">But to obtain this relief, the special motion to dismiss “must be filed within 60 days after service of the complaint, which period may be extended by the court for good cause shown.”</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">The 60-day period “runs from the filing of the most recent amended [counterclaim].” Randazza’s special motion is late.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Cox’s last operative iteration of her </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">counterclaims was filed on February 24, 2014</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">, giving Randazza until April 28, 2014, to file a timely special motion under NRS 41.600. But he waited an additional four months—until August 15, 2014—to finally file it. I find Randazza’s excuse for the delay unavailing. Randazza first moved to dismiss Cox’s claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) or strike them in March 2014, and </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">I resolved those motions in May</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">."</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">CLEARLY Randazza is the one who filed a </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) against his former client Crystal Cox and not the other way around. </b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.. and that is just what Randazza did to his former Client Crystal Cox, yet begs the court to dismiss her VALID claims as if she filed the SLAPP SUIT.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza filed a SLAPP suit </b><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">“<span style="color: blue;">to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned</span>.”</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">He filed the case against Cox, and harassed her non-stop for nearly 3 years now. She is homeless, penniless and has no attorney, he is the one that took her intellectual property, her livlihood, and pressured her to abandon the case and do what he told her to do.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Then he files yet again to dismiss Crystal Cox's claims, as if SLAPP has anything to do with malpractice really. And the court denies this claim, as seen at the link below.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.241.0.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.241.0.pdf</a></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza then, assumedly scared shitless, filed a time stalling frivolous motion to the Ninth Circuit to appeal the above FAIR and JUST ruling as a matter of law.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is the Randazza v Cox, and counterclaims docket</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">So after the District of Nevada yet again DENIES his whiny dribble, then Mr. super duper Randazza whines to the Ninth circuit court as if he is the injured party. Hmmm ..</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is the </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">DOCKET for the Ninth Circuit Randazza whiny dribble appeal of the Judicial Decision above that `DENIED him super powers to squash litigants rights of due process.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601503.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601503.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Nevada Anti-Slapp Laws and Marc Randazza</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><u>BELOW IS A BIT FROM THE RANDAZZA v. COX COUNTERCOMPLAINT</u></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Crystal Cox, Pro Se, sued Marc Randazza, her former attorney, for malpractice and for defamation.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">This Post is in regard to Exhibit 22 regarding Ken White's unlawful attack on Blogger Crystal Cox.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">The Point of Sharing this is to show what these guys do to people like me, there are many of us out there, and what they say about these attorneys who gang up on targets to affect the outcome of court cases, to intimidate litigants and affect settlements is true.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Click Below for Exhibit 22 of </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza v. Cox,</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> Clearly Showing that Kenneth White of Popehat.com was working with attorney Marc Randazza to Deliberately Destroy the Life of Crystal Cox. This is in clear violation of law and the rights of former client.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Click Below to See Exhibit Post from Kenneth P. White's defamatory blog Popehat.com</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><u>Here is a Bit More on Exhibit 22 Above.</u></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="docs-internal-guid-5e9d86c8-99e3-b77d-977a-897aa9981850" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 a blog post from Popehat.com which is a legal blog by First Amendment Attorney Kenneth P. White of the Law Firm, Brown, White and Newhouse out of California.</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Kenneth P. White has a reputation of suing on the Painting in False Light statute in California, and seems to get the laws about posting false statements as if they are facts. Yet he deliberated attacked anti-corruption blogger Crystal Cox and came to the odd defense of Porn Attorney Marc Randazza, who clearly, flat out lied to him about Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Ken White is a friend and close associate of Marc Randazza and works with the Free Speech Coalition alongside Randazza, seems to take Marc Randazza's word as if it were LAW, Flat out Fact and with total disregard for the constitutional rights of Marc Randazza's victims, such as Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. </span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Kenneth White deliberately, willfully, wantonly painted Anti-Corruption blogger Crystal Cox in false light, knowing full well that what he posted was false statements of fact. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">And knowing full well that it was illegal to "gang up" on Randazza Legal Group's former client Crystal Cox. This violates attorney ethics and the law, as well as the constitutional rights of Crystal Cox. Ken White is an attorney, he KNOWS the law and he is bound to attorney Ethics of which he CLEARLY violated.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Kenneth P. White took the word of Marc J. Randazza and deliberately, knowingly, defamed Crystal Cox <b>MALICIOUSLY</b> and with total disregard for the rights of Blogger Crystal Cox, her side of the story, the truth, or the Law.</span></div>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibFhleXdsZ2FBbTQ/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><br /></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibFhleXdsZ2FBbTQ/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza v. Cox, counterclaim (Cox v. Randazza) Exhibit 21</a> shows an email from Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox's former attorney, offering her help, even if in the background and saying he respected her.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">"Subject From To Date Crystal, RE: from Pre Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox mjr@randazza.com <mjr@randazza.com> Crystal L. Cox <savvybroker@yahoo.com> </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:55 PM </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">"I want to address a few things: First and foremost, if you feel that I did not treat you respectfully, <span style="color: #990000;"><b> I humbly apologize. </b></span> </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">I do not wish to leave that undiscussed. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism,</b> and I wish to see you succeed. I also want to correct a misperception here. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">I did not tell anyone that I represented you, for certain. <b><span style="color: #990000;">I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered </span></b>- but that I wanted to speak to him first (to test his waters with respect to a possible mutually agreeable resolution). </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"> Finally, I want to make it clear that our discussion about money was in terms of "costs." I thought that I made it clear that my bills, my fees (my income) would be waived. All that I was asking you about being able to pay was out of pocket reimbursement of expenses. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Despite the contents of this email, <b><span style="color: #990000;">I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background</span></b>. - Marc"</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibt 17 </a>of Cox's Counterclaims against Marc Randazza, suing him for Malpractice and Defamation, is linked below.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit</a><br /><br />Exhibit 17 was a </span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">private email from Blogger Crystal Cox, taking her former attorney at his word of offering help, and asking him for a possible job or job recommendation.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">A partial email thread was posted on Ken White's blog, Popehat.com and<b> made to look as if it were the felony crime of extortion</b>, when as Exhibit 17 clearly shows Randazza said flat out that he had no issue with Cox asking for a job and <b>admits to that clearly</b>. This part of the email thread was initially, maliciously, unethically, unlawfully left out to paint Cox as a CRIMINAL.</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Ken White posted this confidential email and painted Cox in false light knowing the laws very well, as he is an attorney. Ken White got this email from the only person who had it, which was Randazza. And posted the email in a public forum to deliberately defame Blogger Crystal Cox to teach her a lesson for not doing as Marc Randazza DEMANDED of her.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>This exhibit proves that Cox's former attorney Marc Randazza deliberately and intentionally defamed Blogger Crystal Cox and is also guilty of malpractice as well as making false and defamatory statements to third parties.</b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Ken White claimed that Cox had targeted a 3 year old. This was malicious and deliberate defamation against Blogger Crystal Cox, with total disregard of the facts. As Crystal Cox never had a blog about a 3 year old. There is NO basis in fact that Cox attacked a toddler, it NEVER even remotely happened. </span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22, Popehat.com blog by California Attorney Kenneth P. White of Brown, White and Newhouse</a> CLEARLY shows yet again that Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox was hailed a "champion", a hero of free speech, and that after the malicious defamation campaign of Marc Randazza and Kenneth White, Cox was the villain, the felon, the extortionist and a monster who attacks a three year old.</span></div>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><br /></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22</a> remarks on Forbes Kashmir Hill and New York Times David Carr turning over rocks to find the truth. Yet Randazza is who told them Cox had extorted him, and had a blog about his child. Randazza made false and defamatory statements to third parties and is guilty of defamation. And Randazza was Cox's attorney and had a duty and obligation to protect COX and not to ruin her life.</span></div>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><br /></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22 shows First Amendment Ken White of Brown, White and Newhouse in California,</a> claiming that Litigant Crystal Cox's private email to attorney David Aman, in her pro se capacity after she was sued for 10 million dollars offer a settlement AND her private email to her</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline;"> former attorney Marc Randazza asking for a job was extortionate.</span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">This is CLEARLY a Blog Post of DEFAMATION. As Kenneth P. White did no fact checking. He simply BELIEVED the Rants of a disgruntled, humiliated, FIRED, former attorney of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Ken White is GUILTY of Defamation. It is not an EXCUSE that he simply believed his associate, attorney Marc Randazza and posted false statements of fact. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Kenneth P. White of Brown, White and Newhouse CLEARLY painted Crystal Cox in false light and clearly BROKE the law of Assault, Slander, Defamation. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">And I would say, Ken White is even possibly guilty of Criminal Defamation as <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22 </a>shows, he did this to target Blogger Crystal Cox in a clear civil conspiracy with other attorneys, including Marc Randazza.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 shows that Kenneth White of Brown, White and Newhouse posted <b>FALSE Statements of FACT</b> and with clear vile defamatory hatred toward Crystal Cox, wishing her to be cockroach stomped.</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22 proves that </a> Kenneth P. White, California First Amendment Attorney and Nevada attorney Marc Randazza was acting with other attorneys to target Crystal Cox, and deliberately render her powerless.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">And these same attorneys DO THIS SAME THING to others they want to Silence, Intimidate, or pressure into a settlement of some kind.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; line-height: 1.38;"><b><u>Here is a quote from Exhibit 22:</u></b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">"First, every time Crystal Cox attacks someone, <b>we can band together </b>— as bloggers did for Marc Randazza when Crystal Cox attacked him — and write<b><span style="color: #990000;"> fair and factual posts </span></b>about the target. That substantially blunted Crystal Cox's attempt to destroy Randazza's reputation by spamming numerous nutty blogs about him, pushing her efforts off the first page. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><span style="color: #990000;">As a team, we can render Crystal Cox powerless and largely irrelevant. </span></b>More speech works . (Now you know why I put up that mysterious Popehat Signal.) </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">It might be nice to start by offering this gesture to X, her victim in the Oregon case. But if you're out there — if she's gone after you, or threatened to — <b>we can help you, too</b>. We'll throw up the Popehat Signal and gather a more-speech team and <b><span style="color: blue;">flush her off the first pages of your search results."</span></b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Crystal Cox is an Investigative Blogger, she did not attack, she reported on and exposed corruption in her unique style. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22</a> proves that these attorneys banded together to go after Blogger Crystal Cox. They did this in Civil Conspiracy to render Cox powerless, irrelevant and to stomp her like a cockroach. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">They did this while intentionally, deliberately, wilful and wantonly, knowing that what they posted was not based in adjudicated fact and was malicious defamation.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span></div>
<b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><u><span style="color: #990000;">Kenneth P. White Initiated a Campaign to DESTROY Crystal Cox's Domain name network and intellectual property, she had build over 16 years. </span></u></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 also says: " Third, we can search for other victims. The emails to X's lawyer and to Randazza are two data points — but showing a remarkably similar approach. Has she done this other times? <b>There's a way to find out </b>— we use reverse whois directories , plug in her name and addresses and email addresses and known associates, and find every domain she has ever registered. I've already started. Then we see whether the domains were used to attack someone. If they were, we start contacting the targets and asking questions — like "has Crystal Cox offered you reputation management services?" </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Why would we want to see if Crystal Cox has sent emails to others like the ones she sent to Randazza and X? Well, <b>two reasons, really.</b> </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>The first is civil. </b></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">If Volokh succeeds in getting Crystal Cox a new trial on appeal — or if anyone else sues her — <b><span style="color: #990000;">a pattern of such communications</span></b>will be very probative of her intent in making false statements about people when she sets up multiple blogs about them. Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) , such "other bad acts" evidence is generally inadmissible — unless it is probative of intent, or knowledge, or motive, or lack of accident, or similar factors. What could be more probative of Crystal Cox's malicious intent than a pattern of such communications — like the pattern we already see in the two described above? And the second reason to investigate further "reputation manager" offers?</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys acted together to destroy Cox's intellection property, online reputation, to paint her in false light and deliberately, willfully and wantonly ruin her life, with total disregard for the law and for their duty and obligations to society as attorneys. </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">They acted in a pattern of communication, not Crystal Cox.</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys were targeting Crystal Cox's domain names, prying into her private information and launching an attack. All based on <b>the third party false and defamatory statements made by Crystal Cox's vengeful former attorney, Marc Randazza.</b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 22 shows that Randazza sued Cox<b> to create a pattern and history</b> to attempt to set up his former client Cox, of which he owed client attorney duties to. They were creating a false "pattern and history" using privileged emails to attorneys that were not extortion and should not have been posted online, period, as a matter of law.</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 22 shows the Federal Law they were going for, to sue me in civil court and set me up for a crime.</a></b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<div style="line-height: 1.38;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Click Below to Read Marc J. Randazza attorney emailing his former client Crystal Cox. He emails Blogger Crystal Cox, his former client, after she fired him. Randazza apologizes and offers help, even if in the background. <b>Yet later</b>, Crystal Cox asks for help and he takes the <b>email out of a thread of emails and deliberately, defames his former client in a malicious worldwide media and legal attack.</b></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.38;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.38;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Exhibit 17</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit</a></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.38;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 1.38;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><u><br /></u></b></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="line-height: 28.98px;"><b><u>A Bit more on What Exhibit 17, in Crystal Cox's counterclaims of Malpractice and Defamaton against Randazza prove;</u></b></span></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" id="docs-internal-guid-5e9d86c8-9ac8-95b7-8d3d-6f82789cb79f" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 17</a> shows that, though Crystal Cox's former attorney Marc Randazza was clearly upset that his former client Blogger Crystal Cox registered the domain name he did not believe she had a reasonable or ethical right to own, Randazza did not tell her he believed it was against the law, or extortion in any way. And in fact <span style="color: #990000;"><b>CLEARLY, Specifically says that he does not mind that Crystal Cox asked him for a job.</b></span></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Randazza is well known for defending the rights of individuals to have domain names with other people's names in it, such as the Glenn Beck case he was in. And to gripe about whom ever they please, well protected under the coveted First Amendment</span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Crystal Cox, assumed that Marc Randaza would have no issue with her owning a domain name that he had decades to purchase if he had wanted, and after she had read his legal arguments in the Glen Beck case and thought, at the time he was a true proponent of Free Speech rights for all.</span></div>
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Crystal Cox, herself, had already won a WIPO claim for the right to own a domain name with 3 different Proskauer Rose attorneys in it. So why in the world would she believe that Randazza's would be different.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Though clearly later shown, WIPO did favor Marc Randazza. <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/1PqcfV_loGIe_S7Y2oBZTDshtDwq00cRQ_UReJkHsxFsbYAc3g_q23jrEQmqczdCnIiLuGni50YxVmh-H/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Check Out Exhibit 2</a></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/1PqcfV_loGIe_S7Y2oBZTDshtDwq00cRQ_UReJkHsxFsbYAc3g_q23jrEQmqczdCnIiLuGni50YxVmh-H/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">WIPO COMPLAINT </a>(clear defamation from attorney Marc Randazza, regarding iViewit </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Inventor Eliot Bernstein and blogger Crystal Cox.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">WIPO Complaint Randazza Filed </span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/1PqcfV_loGIe_S7Y2oBZTDshtDwq00cRQ_UReJkHsxFsbYAc3g_q23jrEQmqczdCnIiLuGni50YxVmh-H/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/1PqcfV_loGIe_S7Y2oBZTDshtDwq00cRQ_UReJkHsxFsbYAc3g_q23jrEQmqczdCnIiLuGni50YxVmh-H/edit</a></span><br /><br />And Below is the world wide defamation publication by WIPO'S Peter Michaelson, friend of Marc Randazza, in which he accuses Cox and Bernstein of the Felony Crime of Extortion with NO ADJUDICATED<br /><br />WIPO DEFAMATORY PUBLICATION<br /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2012-1525" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2012-1525</a><br /><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Motion in Limine for above Exhibit</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/11dKxWMPPXsSIQH20o1AL88InEYKBP8fYezVOOumeyjk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/11dKxWMPPXsSIQH20o1AL88InEYKBP8fYezVOOumeyjk/edit</a></span><br /><br />It is clear to see from this blog post that Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox's former attorney maliciously lied about her, defamed her and iViewit inventor Eliot Bernstein with full knowledge he was doing it. As it's clear in Randazza's email to Cox that he knew she was merely asking for a job. But flat out LIED in sworn documents to WIPO, with malicious and deliberate intent.<br /><br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 17 CLEARLY shows that counter defendant Marc Randazza did not have an issue with Cox asking him for a Job.</a></b></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">In fact Exhibit 17 shows clearly, without a doubt that Randazza did not believe he was being extorted, but that in fact, he believed Cox was unreasonable and unethical for registering the domain name, but that<b><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"> she was just asking for a job.</a></b></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">This Exhibit proves that Randazza, with full knowledge of it being false,</a></b> interviewed and flat out lied, made false and defamatory statements to NPR, Forbes, the New York Times, WIPO, the Czech Courts, Tracy Coenen and the Fraud Files, Kenneth White attorney blogger of Popehat.com and numerous other well connected bloggers, and Media around the world. As well as made these false and defamatory statement in courts and on his own blog. <b><span style="color: blue;">KNOWING full well that it was false.</span></b></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">RANDAZZA gave blogger attorney Kenneth P. White of Popehat.com<b><span style="color: #990000;"> Cox's personal, privileged, private email to her former attorney who told her to let him know if he could help her in any way, </span></b>and he used this email to paint Crystal Cox in false light, deliberately not posting the whole email thread which showed that he knew Cox was asking for a job.</span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Therefore because Cox would not simply turn over a domain name he thought she had no right to own, he went on NPR, interviewed with the New York Times, Forbes, Popehat.com, and he viciously, deliberately, knowing it was false, lied, made false statements to WIPO who used their global clout to ruin the lives of Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox and accuse them worldwide and nationwide, in legal blogs, in big and small media, that Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein ( who never was even in the email) had extorted him, which is a felony crime.</span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">CLEARLY Crystal Cox is entitled to relief for the damage Randazza has caused her, though Cox has no attorney or way to articulate this evidence on a legal basis. Cox has valid claims and <a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">exhibit 17 further proves this.</a></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 17</a> shows that Randazza was <b>"deeply offended"</b> and that he did not think Cox was reasonable or ethical. However, Randazza clearly never claimed Cox was extorting him, nor did he believe this at the time. Yet later,<b> in retaliation, he deliberately defamed Cox in a widespread, malicious, willful and wanton campaign of revenge, harassment, and widespread posting and speaking false and defamatory statements against Cox to third parties. </b></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">This ruined Cox's life, quality of life and business. This also put Crystal Cox in constant danger, duress and up against massive, widespread hate in big and small media around the world. And simply for registering a domain name and asking for a job.</span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>Randazza has caused Cox irreparable damage.</b></span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Exhibit 17 </a></b>shows Counter Defendant Marc Randazza Say, <b><span style="color: blue;">"Asking me for a job, or a recommendation? That doesn't bother me in the least."</span></b> Yet because Cox did not do as he told her to, <b>he retaliated and ruined her life.</b> And told countless media that he was not only bothered by it but put in terror, stress and extreme duress over it. Which was untrue and Exhibit 17 shows this.</span></div>
<br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Randazza swore to WIPO that Cox had extorted him and did all the things published worldwide in Exhibit 2. Randazza made false and defamatory statements to third parties, willfully and wanton and with full knowledge that they were not true.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Marc Randazza is friends with Trademark attorney Peter Michaelson (INTA). He has been seen with him at INTA meetings. Peter Michaelson was the Sole WIPO panelist that decided on this decision. He took Marc Randazza at his word, because he knew him and trusted him.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b>This exhibit proves the damage Randazza deliberately, maliciously caused his former client Crystal Cox, and that he made false statements to WIPO knowing full well they were false.</b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><br /><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">Randazza got the New York Times, Philly Law Blog, Forbes and others to post defamatory statements about Cox, then he used those articles as exhibits in his WIPO complaint, as some sort of proof.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><br /><div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><b><span style="color: blue;">PAY ATTENTION TO THE ENTIRE RANDAZZA v. COX CASE AND COUNTER CLAIMS AS THIS PROVES WHAT THESE ATTORNEYS DO TO MANY.</span></b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;">MOTION IN LIMINE EXHIBIT 17</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I159SAmI5r4zRJOwt28a_fG8XsNDu5TTFZMg1q9wSEk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I159SAmI5r4zRJOwt28a_fG8XsNDu5TTFZMg1q9wSEk/edit</a></span><br /><br /><br />MOTION IN LIMINE EXHIBIT 22<br /><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jux23ASWFxziaZRI9JvWmQi1rCxiYBVnJPHRsNnaCkk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jux23ASWFxziaZRI9JvWmQi1rCxiYBVnJPHRsNnaCkk/edit</a><br /><br /><br />MOTION IN LIMINE EXHIBIT 2<br /><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/11dKxWMPPXsSIQH20o1AL88InEYKBP8fYezVOOumeyjk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/11dKxWMPPXsSIQH20o1AL88InEYKBP8fYezVOOumeyjk/edit</a><br /><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;">
<b><u>Randazza v. Cox, District of Nevada, 2:12-cv-02040. Docket Link Below</u></b></div>
<br /><table style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 0px 0px 50px;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 1px 30px 1px 10px;"><b>Case Cause:</b></td><td style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 1px 30px 1px 10px;">15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)</td></tr>
<tr><td style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 1px 30px 1px 10px;"><b>Nature of Suit:</b></td><td style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 1px 30px 1px 10px;">840 Trademark</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: #990000;">MARC RANDAZZA KNOWING PUBLISHED AND MADE WORLDWIDE FALSE STATEMENTS </span></b></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: #990000;">ABOUT ME, BLOGGER CRYSTAL COX AND THEN USED NEVADA SLAPP TO ATTEMPT </span></b></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: #990000;">TO STOP ME FROM A COUNTERCLAIM. </span></b></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-20420186413193756922016-04-11T20:45:00.001-07:002016-04-11T20:45:28.407-07:00Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group sued his former Client Crystal Cox. He filed a SLAPP suit against her to stop her consumer review and gripe sites about him. It is going on 3 years now. Marc Randazza uses the NEVADA Anti-SLAPP Laws he co-wrote to STRIP his victims of their constitutional Rights.<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><b>Marc Randazza is a Hypocritical Liar.</b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Research the Randazza v. Cox and Bernstein case, where Marc Randazza sued me, Blogger Crystal Cox and video technology inventor Eliot Bernstein to steal our FREE SPEECH, Violate our First Amendment Rights, Chill Free Speech, shut down gripe sights about him, bully us, intimidate us, threaten us, data mine our private life, phone records, business records, friends, family and put us under extreme stress for 3 years and counting.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">When I, Crystal Cox, attempted to FIGHT BACK and stand up for my constitutional rights, </span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.247.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> used Nevada Anti-SLAPP Laws to block a counter complaint against him for MALPRACTICE and DEFAMATION. A case with CLEAR and convincing evidence. Marc Randazza did Defame me, Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein and did so with malicious intent, KNOWING full well that his false allegations were not true.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="http://ia801608.us.archive.org/5/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.26.0.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> says </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"some companies get a bad review" </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">and their response is to </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">do a better JOB</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">But <a href="http://ia801608.us.archive.org/5/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.26.0.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a> and attorney Marc Randazza gets a bad review and </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">their RESPONSE is </span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">to file a 3 million dollar lawsuit, a Lanham act lawsuit, a trademark lawsuit and to simply take mass domain names from iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein and Blogger Crystal Cox and all to SHUT down Gripe Sites, or bad reviews.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza Legal Group and attorney Marc Randazza</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> gets a bad review and their RESPONSE is get a gang of attorneys, law firms, media, Forbes, NPR, the New York Times, WIPO, CZECH courts and other courts across the land to target, retaliate, defame, bully, and threaten the person who made those comments, Crystal L. Cox.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">When </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> gets a bad review their RESPONSE is to simply move domain names to their Godaddy Account, sue their targets in multiple states, and make them STOP talking about </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> and </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupies.blogspot.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> RESPONDS </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">to a</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> <span style="color: #990000;">RIP OFF REPORT</span> </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">(a bad consumer review) by getting the owner of the site, Ed Magedson, to remove his name, getting attorney Kenneth P. White of PopeHat.com to post lies and get this placed on top of the report and by hijacking my Randazza Legal Group, </span><a href="http://adamsteinbaugh.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> Rip Off Report (consmer review).</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">World's most Hypocritical, (NOT Free Speech Advocate), Unconstitutional Attorney </span><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupies.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> say that if you </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">"sue the commenter"</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> then you are </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">"ignoble and horrible"</span> </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">YET that is exactly what Marc Randazza and </span><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupies.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> did to their former client, Blogger Crystal Cox and iViewit Video Technology inventor Eliot Bernsten.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">So the VERDICT is in straight from the mouth of Unconstitutional Attorney </span><a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc J. Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of hypocritical LAWLESS Law Firm Randazza Legal Group.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
Marc Randazza and the "company", law firm,</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a> </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b>is HORRIBLE and IGNOBLE</b>.</div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">I would not want to</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> go " bankrupt"</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> or </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"tick off the wrong person"</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> bankrupts his targets, he sues them, bullies them, harasses them, threatens them and puts them under years of duress and stress RUINING their life, business and relationship and putting them on constant watch of his THUGS he hires to taunt, blog, target, bully and attack his victims.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">And all because they DARED to Exercise their First Amendment RIGHT to gripe about him, review him, parody him, trash talk him, make fun of him, and stand up to him.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HpjizN4WHSc" style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" width="560"></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-11870654487598974682016-04-11T20:44:00.004-07:002016-04-11T20:44:50.362-07:00Attorney Marc Randazza - Nevada Bar Complaint Marc Randazza - Randazza Legal Group<b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada Bar Complaint</a> <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> - <a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-16659116252511481812016-04-11T20:44:00.002-07:002016-04-11T20:44:25.061-07:00A Trademark Attorney, First Amendment Expert SUES a former client claiming a Trademark Infringement on Gripe Sites.<span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Then this attorney claims the case is about extortion, then claims the client defamed him. Yet he originally said the case was not about extortion but only trademark.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">This attorney SEIZED massive online content, blogs, domain names and engaged in a massive campaign to attack his former client, and all to teach her a lesson for not doing what he told her, and to ''try'' and stop her from talking online about him and his law firm.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Can you imagine an outspoken Free Speech attorney attacking a blogger to suppress her speech, stealing domain names and claiming Trademark Violations on blogs that gripe about him?</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">It is seriously unethica</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">l to use Trademark Law</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> in order to take online content, chill speech, suppress speech and STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of someone you don't like talking about you. ,</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">In order to like something, someone, some company or express dislike or any opinion about them AT ALL, You would have to use the name of the company, doctor, lawyer, CPA, or whatever that person is.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">An ALLEGED expert in this area would know that suing someone that is talking about them online and claiming Trademark is wrong, is not lawful and is certainly on the wrong side of the moral compass.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">This attorney seized online content through a TRO, in which, flat out STOLE intellectual property, search engine placement, and the work of another without ANY First Amendment adjudication in any way. And Judge Gloria Navarro of the District of Nevada let this happen and let those sites, blogs, and domain names be redirected to a blog post hating, defaming, and painting in false light, this same former client.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue;">How does this RADICAL LAWLESSNESS HAPPEN?</span></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Well First you need an attorney with lot's of connections and no morals or ethics, like say a Porn Attorney, that is an expert in First Amendment Law.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Take a Look at the Docket below as you clearly see a gang of attorneys attack blogger Crystal Cox in order to attempt to silence her, chill her speech, all without ANY adjudicated fact.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Attorney Marc Randazza used Trademark Laws, an Unconstitutional TRO</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> and a gang of attorney bloggers to destroy the life, reputation, legal cases, and business of his target, in this case his former client Blogger Crystal Cox who stood up to him.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza et al v. Cox et al; Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey, Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen; 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act); 840 Trademark * <span style="color: blue;">FULL DOCKET</span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue;"><u>A Bit on WHY it is Lawless and Unethical to USE Trademark Law to Chill Speech</u></span></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b> A TRADEMARK IS NOT A CENSOR TOOL</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">
<br /></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOME THOUGHTS AFTER</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">ELDRED, 44 LIQUORMART, AND BARTNICKI </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">*Eugene Volokh* </b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/speechip.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/speechip.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b>Four Free Speech Goals for Trademark Law</b></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">William McGeveran*</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://iplj.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Symposium-FOUR-FREE-SPEECH-GOALS-FOR-TRADEMARK-LAW.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://iplj.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Symposium-FOUR-FREE-SPEECH-GOALS-FOR-TRADEMARK-LAW.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Trademark Laws SHOULD NOT be used to trample First Amendment Rights</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.ie/2014/11/the-first-amendment-trumps-trademark.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.ie/2014/11/the-first-amendment-trumps-trademark.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Trademark Law Does Not Require Companies To Tirelessly Censor the Internet </b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not-require-companies-tirelessly-censor-internet" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not-require-companies-tirelessly-censor-internet</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Trademark Law is NOT for Censoring Critics</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141013/06244728806/eff-to-naacp-trademark-isnt-censoring-your-critics.shtml" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141013/06244728806/eff-to-naacp-trademark-isnt-censoring-your-critics.shtml</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Eugene Volokh, July 24, 2006</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Amici Briefs in the Free Speech / Trademark Injunction Case:</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://www.volokh.com/posts/1153781932.shtml" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.volokh.com/posts/1153781932.shtml</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/copyinj.htm" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/copyinj.htm</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.eff.org/files/2013/11/05/eff_amicus_brief_fortres_grand.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/files/2013/11/05/eff_amicus_brief_fortres_grand.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: medium;">A Bit on the First Amendment Trumps Trademark Law</span></b></div>
<a href="http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.ie/2013/01/chill-free-speech-first-amendment-legal.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.ie/2013/01/chill-free-speech-first-amendment-legal.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">E.S.S. Entm’t 2000 v. Rock Star Videos: First Amendment Trumps Trademark Rights</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://www.lawupdates.com/commentary/iess_entmt_2000_v_rock_star_videos_i_first_amendment_trumps_trademark_right" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;">http://www.lawupdates.com/commentary/iess_entmt_2000_v_rock_star_videos_i_first_amendment_trumps_trademark_right</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">EFF to Court: A Trademark Is Not A Censorship Tool</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/eff-court-trademark-not-censorship-tool" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/eff-court-trademark-not-censorship-tool</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">First Amendment TRUMPS Trademark; Big Ruling Says Using Trademarks In Artistic Works Can Be Protected Under The First Amendment</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120613/18230119312/big-ruling-says-using-trademarks-artistic-works-can-be-protected-under-first-amendment.shtml" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120613/18230119312/big-ruling-says-using-trademarks-artistic-works-can-be-protected-under-first-amendment.shtml</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/internet/trademark-infringement-or-first-amendment-right-of-freedom-of-speech" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/internet/trademark-infringement-or-first-amendment-right-of-freedom-of-speech</a><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b><u><br /></u></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b><u>A Bit on the Lanham Act in which Randazza used (abused)</u></b></span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.ie/2013/01/the-lanham-act-to-steal-domain-names.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.ie/2013/01/the-lanham-act-to-steal-domain-names.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Crystal Cox on the </span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Lanham Act</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">, Trademark and more on this case</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.ie/2014/12/randazza-v-cox-lanham-act-trademark.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.ie/2014/12/randazza-v-cox-lanham-act-trademark.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">A Bit on the Unethical, Unconstitutional use of a TRO to Suppress Speech</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> and STEAL intellectual property.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://freespeechsuppression.blogspot.ie/2014/02/crystal-cox-marc-randazza-preliminary.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://freespeechsuppression.blogspot.ie/2014/02/crystal-cox-marc-randazza-preliminary.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Full Docket of Randazza v. Cox</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-68129816737201121652016-04-11T20:43:00.002-07:002016-04-11T20:43:51.604-07:00Attorney Marc Randazza involved in writing Nevada's overreaching SLAPP laws has used the law to try and suppress speech and violate the rights of others, such as blogger Crystal Cox.<a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> CLEARLY filed a </span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">SLAPP lawsuit </a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">against blogger Crystal Cox, with the clear motive to shut her up, suppress her speech, steal here blogs and search engine placement and violate her First Amendment rights. </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc J. Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> used his knowledge, clout and gang of attorney thugs to flat out lie to the media and courts regarding his targets.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of</span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"> Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> has abused </span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada SLAPP Laws</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> for personal gain.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">As a matter of law there is no way, no reason that Crystal Cox's former attorney </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> of </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> should have sued her. Yet he did and got Judge Gloria Navarro to give him massive blogs and domain names and to change the server and redirect them all WITHOUT First Amendment Adjudication, to </span><a href="http://ethicscomplaint.blogspot.ie/2015/04/marc-randazza-is-using-blogger-crystal.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">'s blog post that defamed his former client Crystal Cox.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Check out the </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">District of Nevada</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">'s DENIAL of Marc Randazza, </span><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> SUMMARY Judgement against Crystal Cox. The court clearly shoots down all his gibberish.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza had no Trademark when he sued Crystal Cox. Even if he did, he cannot use Trademark Law to chill speech, yet that is exactly what he did and Judge Gloria Navarro of the District of Nevada plus Peter Michaelson of WIPO allowed Randazza Legal Group, and Marc Randazza, as well as Ronald Green to do just that.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Marc Randazza is NOT above the Law. Crystal Cox has proved that without a doubt. And now we have a Nevada |SLAPP law scuffle. As Marc Randazza clearly sued Cox in a frivolous Nevada SLAPP Suit, yet when she sues him in a counterclaim of Malpractice and Defamation he cries protection under Nevada SLAPP and does so years after he initially sued her and well past the 60 day deadline. The courts rule against him and he is now whining to the Ninth Circuit.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Click the Links Below for more on the NINTH Circuit Whine</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> by Marc Randazza regarding using Nevada SLAPP laws to attempt to Deny the rights of a former client he sued, defamed and caused irreparable harm, by using </span><a href="http://nevadaslapp.blogspot.ie/2015/04/randazza-v-cox-court-denies-yet-another_18.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada Anti-SLAPP Law</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://nevadaslapp.blogspot.ie/2015/04/randazza-v-cox-court-denies-yet-another_18.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://nevadaslapp.blogspot.ie/2015/04/randazza-v-cox-court-denies-yet-another_18.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ethicscomplaint.blogspot.ie/2015/04/marc-randazza-is-using-blogger-crystal.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ethicscomplaint.blogspot.ie/2015/04/marc-randazza-is-using-blogger-crystal.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"><b>Now We See this Headline</b></span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"><b>''Nevada May Be About To Lose Its Great <a href="http://nevadaslapp.blogspot.ie/2015/04/randazza-v-cox-court-denies-yet-another_18.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Anti-SLAPP Law</a>''</b></span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">''We've mentioned many times the importance of anti-SLAPP laws in protecting people who are being sued solely to try to shut them up. It's still a travesty that we don't have a federal anti-SLAPP law but are reliant on various state anti-SLAPP laws.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> In case you're not familiar with them, SLAPP stands for </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation."</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> Anti-SLAPP laws basically allow people who are sued to quickly get lawsuits dismissed when it's obvious that the entire point of the lawsuit is to silence whoever is being sued, rather than for any legitimate legal purpose. For years, California was seen as having one of the best anti-SLAPP laws, but in recent years both Texas and Nevada upped the ante in anti-SLAPP laws, making them even stronger. Nevada's had a particularly useful feature: it would award </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">"reasonable costs, attorney's fees and monetary relief" for defendants who were wrongfully hit with SLAPP suits. Basically, it provided a real deterrent against SLAPP suits. ''</span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Full Article and Source</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150416/16534230679/nevada-may-be-about-to-lose-great-anti-slapp-law.shtml" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150416/16534230679/nevada-may-be-about-to-lose-great-anti-slapp-law.shtml</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> hit blogger Crystal Cox with a SLAPP suit and she was NOT given any rights. Now Marc Randazza wants to deny legitimate counter claims against his bad behavior as her former attorney, by ABUSING </span><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">NEVADA Anti-SLAPP Laws</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Looks to me like Marc Randazza will not win his appeal at the NINTH, seems now he has 20 days and so many changes to the overreaching laws he wrote and made money from.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is the </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Nevada SLAPP 444</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> Senate Bill (a Game Changer for Whiny Randazza)</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b>Full Docket of Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit Marc Randazze filed against </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b>former client Blogger Crystal Cox. </b> <a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<u><b><span style="font-size: medium;">A Bit More on Senate Bill 444</span></b></u></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
''Section 5 of this bill requires a special motion to dismiss <span style="color: blue;"><b>to be filed within 20</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
21 <b><span style="color: blue;">days of service of the complaint,</span></b> and to be limited to the issue of whether the claim </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
22 arises from <b>a communication in furtherance of the right to petition</b> or the right to </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
23 <span style="color: blue;"><b> free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern</b></span>. If the court </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
24 determines that such a claim does not arise from a communication in furtherance of </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
25 the right to petition or the right to free speech in direct connection with an issue of </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
26 public concern, section 6 of this bill requires the court to deny the special motion to </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
27 dismiss. If the court determines that the claim does arise from a communication in </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
28 furtherance of the right to petition or the right to free speech in direct connection </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
29 with an issue of public concern, section 7 of this bill requires the plaintiff to </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
30 establish prima facie evidence supporting each and every element of the claim other </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
31 than elements requiring proof of the subjective intent or knowledge of the </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
32 defendant. <b>Section 7</b> further requires the court to determine whether the plaintiff </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
33 has established such prima facie evidence within</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
34 plaintiff’s filing of briefs and supporting evidence.''</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<b>Read the Whole Document at the Link Below</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicFAwazl1RVNzdWc/edit</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">I would say Marc Randazza is kind of screwed in his Ninth Circuit appeal, oh well, we shall see how it all plays out. </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Poor DUMBDAZZA</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">, still biting at the heels of Super Blogger Crystal Cox.</span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-9264068549685880982016-04-11T20:42:00.004-07:002016-04-11T20:42:54.930-07:00Randazza v. Cox; Court DENIES yet another begging blathering motion to dismiss Cox's VALID Defamation and Malpractice CLAIMS. Court DENIES and RANDAZZA then whines to the Ninth Circuit.<b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"Randazza first moves to dismiss Cox’s counterclaims under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law, NRS 41.660"</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Marc Randazza filed a SLAPP lawsuit against his former client Crystal Cox to suppress her speech. Yet he tries to claim SLAPP as a defense against her defamation and malpractice claim. And does this wayyyy after she filed those claims.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Court Says, </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"I find Randazza’s special motion to dismiss was not filed by NRS 41.660’s 60-day deadline and that the filing delay is not supported by good cause. I therefore deny the special motion to dismiss. I also deny Randazza’s motion to strike Cox’s answer and enter default because claimdispositive sanctions are presently unwarranted. Cox has not been explicitly warned that such sanctions could issue if she continues to disregard court rules and file frivolous motions, and I decline to take such a draconian step without first warning her of this possibility."</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">THE COURT DENIED RANDAZZA MOTIONS TO DISMISS COX'S COUNTERCLAIM OVER AND OVER. YET HE DESPERATELY KEEPS BEGGING FOR ANOTHER WAY.</span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">COURT SAYS; </b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"A. Special Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 224] Randazza specially moves for dismissal of Cox’s remaining </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">counterclaims for defamation and malpractice</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> under NRS 41.660, which provides protections for defendants in </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP)</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Succinctly, “[</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">A SLAPP claimant typically seeks </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">“to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned.”</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">5 NRS 41.660 provides a special, expedited procedure for obtaining the dismissal of SLAPP suits.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">But to obtain this relief, the special motion to dismiss “must be filed within 60 days after service of the complaint, which period may be extended by the court for good cause shown.”</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">The 60-day period “runs from the filing of the most recent amended [counterclaim].” Randazza’s special motion is late.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Cox’s last operative iteration of her </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">counterclaims was filed on February 24, 2014</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">, giving Randazza until April 28, 2014, to file a timely special motion under NRS 41.600. But he waited an additional four months—until August 15, 2014—to finally file it. I find Randazza’s excuse for the delay unavailing. Randazza first moved to dismiss Cox’s claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) or strike them in March 2014, and </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">I resolved those motions in May</span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">."</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">CLEARLY Randazza is the one who filed a </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) against his former client Crystal Cox and not the other way around. </b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">"</span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;">a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">.. and that is just what Randazza did to his former Client Crystal Cox, yet begs the court to dismiss her VALID claims as if she filed the SLAPP SUIT.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza filed a SLAPP suit </b><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">“<span style="color: blue;">to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned</span>.”</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">He filed the case against Cox, and harassed her non-stop for nearly 3 years now. She is homeless, penniless and has no attorney, he is the one that took her intellectual property, her livlihood, and pressured her to abandon the case and do what he told her to do.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Then he files yet again to dismiss Crystal Cox's claims, as if SLAPP has anything to do with malpractice really. And the court denies this claim, as seen at the link below.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"></span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.241.0.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.241.0.pdf</a></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Randazza then, assumedly scared shitless, filed a time stalling frivolous motion to the Ninth Circuit to appeal the above FAIR and JUST ruling as a matter of law.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is the Randazza v Cox, and counterclaims docket</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">So after the District of Nevada yet again DENIES his whiny dribble, then Mr. super duper Randazza whines to the Ninth circuit court as if he is the injured party. Hmmm ..</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Here is the </span><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">DOCKET for the Ninth Circuit Randazza whiny dribble appeal of the Judicial Decision above that `DENIED him super powers to squash litigants rights of due process.</b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://ia601503.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610.docket.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://ia601503.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610.docket.html</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891241138321568475.post-85499416382910696622016-04-11T20:42:00.001-07:002016-04-11T20:42:23.164-07:00Marc Randazza is using Blogger Crystal Cox as the collateral damage of his Nevada SLAPP Legal Games.<b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"><span style="color: #990000;">Crystal Cox's counter claim is not a frivolous lawsuit. RANDAZZA sued COX, the court DENIED Cox the use of Nevada's alleged all powerful SLAPP laws, though clearly his case was frivolous and without merit what so ever. </span></b><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">''Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute has been dramatically expanded, bringing Nevada into line with California, Oregon, Washington, Texas, and the District of Columbia as having the most comprehensive anti-SLAPP statutes in the nation. Changes include:</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Expands the Breadth and Scope of Protected Speech. The new law expands protected conduct to include any “communication made in direct connection with an issue of public interest in a place open to the public or in a public forum,” so long as the statement is truthful or made without knowledge of falsehood.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Allows For an Immediate Appeal of a Denied Anti-SLAPP Motion. The new law modifies NRS 41.650 so that a movant is immune from any civil action – not just liability – from claims arising from his or her protected speech, which allows for an immediate appeal.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Expedites Judicial Consideration of Anti-SLAPP Motions. Under the new law’s changes, the time for a court to rule on a motion after filing is reduced to 7 judicial days from 30 after the motion is served upon the plaintiff.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Creates a $10,000 Stick to Deter Frivolous Claims. In addition to allowing for a movant’s recovery of costs and attorneys’ fees, the bill amends NRS 41.670 to allow the court to discretionarily award a successful movant up to $10,000 in addition to his or her reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. This serves as a significant disincentive and warning for those who might wish to pursue censorious litigation.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Creates SLAPP-Back Provision to Prevent Frivolous Anti-SLAPP Motions. The bill amends 41.670 so that a court denying a special motion to dismiss must award the claimant to successfully defeat the Anti-SLAPP motion his or her costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees upon finding that the Anti-SLAPP motion was “frivolous or vexatious.”</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Retains Key Elements From Nevada’s Existing Laws. While the bill represents a massive change to Nevada’s Anti-SLAPP laws, Nevada’s existing statutes had a number of powerful provisions that were unique among Anti-SLAPP provisions are fortunately still intact. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">The Nevada Attorney General,</b><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;"> or the “chief legal officer or attorney of a political subdivision” in Nevada may still “defend or otherwise support the person against whom the action is brought.” NRS 41.660(1)(b). SB 286 also retains the successful Anti-SLAPP movant’s right to bring a separate action against the defeated plaintiff for compensatory damages, punitive damages, and the attorneys’ fees and costs for bringing the new action.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Read more from Marc Randazza, who was instrumental in helping get the law amended, here:</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">http://randazza.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/nevada-has-a-new-anti-slapp-law/</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Read the full text of Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law here:</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="https://nelis.leg.state.nv.us/77th2013/App#/77th2013/Bill/Text/SB286" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;">https://nelis.leg.state.nv.us/77th2013/App#/77th2013/Bill/Text/SB286</a><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;">Source</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px;" /><a href="http://www.anti-slapp.org/recent/nevada-has-a-new-anti-slapp-law/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.2px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.anti-slapp.org/recent/nevada-has-a-new-anti-slapp-law/</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0