Attorney Marc Randazza did not believe that Crystal Cox had extorted him, yet he set out on a world wide, defamatory, malicious hate campaign against blogger Crystal Cox. And ALL THIS after he was her attorney and owed her duties as such.

This Exhibit Proves that Marc Randazza acted as Crystal Cox's attorney. The proof is Marc Randazza's own sworn statement. Click Below for more.

Click Below for Full Motion in Limine Regarding this Exhibit
http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.252.0.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does Marc Randazza sue Corbin Fisher TALENT if they won't have sex with him? Hmmm..

It is so funny, well rather Evil actually, that Marc Randazza sued me Crystal Cox and sued Alexandra Mayers, and accused us all, including Diana Grandmason and Eliot Bernste in of Extortion when it seems that it is well known in the Gay Porn industry that Randazza is consistantly involved in shakedown lawsuits over copyright and trademark BOGUS claims AND that Marc Randazza allegedly CONSTANTLY is accused of extorting Gay Men at Corbin Fisher, if they won't have sex with him. This tip was given to me years ago and again recently. Yet RANDAZZA paints us out as extortionists, and as down right evil for having a domain name of his child. WOW And Remember This Article https://www.queerty.com/corbin-fisher-doesnt-care-about-the-thieving-little-shits-who-might-commit-suicide-if-outed-20110224
Read more

When I First Spoke to Marc Randazza he said that the Big Media had a Monopoly on Free Speech and there was Not Much I Could Do about it. Guess I Proved First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza VERY Wrong.

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox was the FIRST to gain Equal Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers to that of Institutional Press Journalists. It was ruled for the first time that a blogger is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist. On 2014, blogger Crystal Cox accused Obsidian and Kevin D. Padrick of corrupt and fraudulent conduct. Although the court dismissed most of Cox's blog posts as opinion, it found one post to be more factual in its assertions (and, therefore, defamatory). It was ruled for the first time, [17] [18] by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit , [19] that a blogger is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist and cannot be liable for defamation unless the blogger acted negligently. [20] In the decision, journalists and bloggers are equally protected under the First Amendment [17] because the "protections of the First Amendment do not turn on whether the defendant was a trained journalist, formally affili...
Read more